In Re Painewebber Inc. Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Painewebber Inc. Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist (nysd, 2005-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist
S.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Rolland v. Cellucci
D. Mass. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bussie, 50 F.Supp.2d at 72 (noting that favorable reaction of class to settlement, albeit not dispositive, constitutes strong evidence of fairness of proposed settlement) (citing In re Painewebber Limited Partnerships Litigation, 171 F.R.D. 104, 106 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir.1997)).
cited Cited "see" Lazy Oil, Co. v. Witco Corp.
W.D. Pa. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Painewebber Limited Partnerships Litig., 171 F.R.D. 104, 124 (S.D.N.Y.1997), aff'd, 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Painewebber Incorporated Limited Partnerships Litigation Rochelle Rittmaster, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated
v.
Robert Jacobson, Vera Jacobson, Painewebber Group, Inc. Painewebber, Inc.
2403.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jul 30, 1997.
117 F.3d 721
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published

117 F.3d 721

In re PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS LITIGATION
Rochelle RITTMASTER, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert JACOBSON, Vera Jacobson, Appellants,
PaineWebber Group, Inc.; PaineWebber, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2403, Docket 97-7540.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued July 15, 1997.
Decided July 30, 1997.

Edward T. Joyce, Chicago, IL, for Appellants.

Edward Labaton, New York City (Nicholas E. Chimicles, Fred Taylor Isquith, Edward Grossmann, Burton H. Finkelstein, David J. Bershad, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew Gluck, New York City (Peter L. Simmons, Rachel S. Fleishman, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert and Vera Jacobson appeal from Judge Stein's approval of a settlement and allocation agreement in this class action and denial of the Jacobsons' motions to intervene and to be certified as subclass representatives. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Stein's opinions. In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 171 F.R.D. 104 (S.D.N.Y.1997); In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnership Litig., --- F.R.D. ----, No. 94 Civ. 8547(SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 1996).