David Cerda, Jr. v. Robert Ayers Joe McGrath S. Lawrence D. Martel G. Bonnie, 133 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
David Cerda, Jr. v. Robert Ayers Joe McGrath S. Lawrence D. Martel G. Bonnie, 133 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Perez v. Cox (nvd, 2022-07-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Perez v. Cox
D. Nev. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Est. of Adams, No. 96-16423, 133 F.3d 926 , 12 1998 WL 4079 at *3 (9th Cir. Jan. 7, 1998) (finding no qualified immunity where the 13 correctional officer shot the inmate in the head and killed him in response to a fistfight between 14 prisoners where a reasonable jury could have concluded the fight “did not pose a significant 15 danger to either prisoner”); Robins v. Meecham, 60 F.3d 1436, 1438, 1441-42 (9th Cir. 1995) 16 (holding a reasonable jury could find an Eighth Amendment violation where the correctional 17 officer used a shotgun on an inmate refusing to lockdown as ordered and…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Cerda, Jr.
v.
Robert Ayers Joe McGrath S. Lawrence D. Martel G. Bonnie
97-15038.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 19, 1997.
133 F.3d 926
Unpublished

133 F.3d 926

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
David CERDA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert AYERS; Joe McGrath; S. Lawrence; D. Martel; G.
Bonnie, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-15038.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 15, 1997.[**]
Decided Dec. 19, 1997.

Before: SNEED, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM[*]

2

California state prisoner David Cerda, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Cerda alleged that his civil rights had been violated by prison officials' failure to let him see his file prior to a Board of Prison Terms ("Board") hearing extending his minimum prison term and refusal to correct false reports in his prison central file. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291. We dismiss the appeal sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). See Marks v. Solcum 98 F.3d 494, 496 (9th Cir.1996) (per curiam).

3

Cerda contends that his right to due process was violated when prison officials failed to allow him to view his record prior to the hearing and because the Beard relied on false reports that were in his file. Cerda's contentions necessarily affect the duration of his sentence and Cerca has not demonstrated that the reports upon which his minimum sentence increase were based have been expunged. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); Preiser v. Rodriquez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973).

4

This dismissal is without prejudice. See Tremble v. City of Santa Ana, 49 F.3d 583, 585 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam).

5

DISMISSED.

**

The panel unanimously finds @his case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not apppropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3