discussed Cited as authority (rule) VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 15 F.3d at 1099; see also Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179 (“[T]he public has less of a need for access to 16 court records attached only to non-dispositive motions because those documents are often 17 unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action.”).

discussed Cited as authority (rule) (HC) Austin v. Covello Id. at 6. 12 These documents do not establish that, during the relevant time, petitioner “was unable 13 rationally or factually to personally understand the need to timely file” or that his “mental state 14 rendered him unable personally to prepare a habeas petition and effectuate its filing.” Bills, 628 15 F.3d at 1099-1100.

cited Cited as authority (rule) Sotelo v. Kijakazi Sullivan, 493 U.S. at 530 ; Tackett, 180 15 F.3d at 1099.