98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,671 Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,671 Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“magana-pizano i”
34 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (ca9, 1999-12-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
magana-pizano i
cited Cited "see" Saini v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
D. Ariz. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Magana-Pizano v. I.N.S., 152 F.3d 1213 , 1221 (9th Cir.), amended, 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir.1998), vacated, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1137 , 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Edoo v. Kaplinger
W.D. La. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213 , amended, 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam), petition for cert. granted, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1137 , 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1998). 8 .
discussed Cited "see" Norman Anthony Hall v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213 , 1216, amended by 159 F.3d 1217 (9thCir.1998); Okoro v. INS, 125 F.3d 920 , 925 & n. 10 (5th Cir.1997); Yang v. INS, 109 F.3d 1185, 1192 (7th Cir.1997) (“When judicial review depends on a particular fact or legal conclusion, then a court may determine whether that condition exists.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 624 , 139 L.Ed.2d 605 (1997). 3 In this case, our jurisdiction turns on whether Hall is “an alien who is ... deportable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in” INA § 241(a)(2)(C).
discussed Cited "see" Hall v. INS
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Magana- _________________________________________________________________ 1 This provision is nearly identical to IIRIRA's permanent provision barring judicial review of the final removal orders of certain criminal aliens, INA § 242(a)(2)(C), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252 (a)(2)(C) (West Supp. 1998), which applies to those proceedings that began on or after April 1, 1997, see IIRIRA § 309(a), (c)(1). 2 This section has been redesignated as INA § 237(a)(2)(C) and now appears at 8 U.S.C.A. § 1227 (a)(2)(C) (West Supp. 1998). 4 Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213, 1216 , amended by 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hinojosa-Perez v. Eddy
D. Alaska · 1999 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Hose v. INS, 141 F.3d 932 (9th Cir.1998), withdrawn and reh’g en banc granted, 161 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir.1998), with Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213, 1216-17 (9th Cir.1998), as amended, 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir.1998), vacated and remanded for reconsideration, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 1137 , 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1999). 3 The magistrate judge wrestled with these opinions in his initial report and recommendation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,671 Daniel Magana-Pizano
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
97-15678.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 13, 1998.
159 F.3d 1217
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

159 F.3d 1217

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 11,671
Daniel MAGANA-PIZANO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 97-15678, 97-70384.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1998.

1

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding and a Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. INS No. Awb-itn-qdy. D.C. No. CV 97-00619 SMM.

2

Before: GOODWIN and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, PREGERSON,[*] District Judge.

ORDER

3

It is ordered that the opinion filed on September 1, 1998, be amended to delete the paragraph at page 5, as reported in 152 F.3d 1213 at 1215, which states:Petitions for review filed between the passage of IIRIRA on September 30, 1996, and IIRIRA's general effective date of April 1, 1997, are governed by interim transitional rules. See IIRIRA § 309(c); Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997).

4

In lieu thereof, the following language is hereby substituted:

5

Immigration proceedings initiated by the INS before IIRIRA's general effective date of April 1, 1997, in which a final deportation or exclusion order was filed after October 30, 1996, are governed by interim transitional rules. See IIRIRA § 309(c); Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997).

*

The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation