green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kobluk v. University of Minnesota
See, e.g., Rohm and Haas Co. v. Brotech Corp., 815 F.Supp. 793, 796 (D.Del.1993) (concluding that privilege applied to draft patent application and to the notes a lawyer had written on it, where an inventor sent the draft to the lawyer as a client, the lawyer “received and acted on [the draft] as a lawyer,” and the draft related to information provided by the client to procure legal advice from the lawyer), af f'd, 19 F.3d 41 (Fed.Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saxholm AS v. Dynal, Inc.
Compare, e.g., Stryker Corp. v. Intermedies Orthopedics, Inc., 145 F.R.D. 298, 303 (E.D.N.Y.1992) and Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Pharmacia, Inc., 130 F.R.D. 116, 126 (N.D.Calif.1990) with, e.g., Rohm and Haas Co. v. Brotech Corp., 815 F.Supp. 793, 794-97 (D.Del.1993), aff'd, 19 F.3d 41 , 1994 WL 48546 (Fed.Cir.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The Ryan Company
v.
Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army
v.
Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army
93-1380.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 22, 1994.
Unpublished
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
The RYAN COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Togo D. WEST, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Appellee.
No. 93-1380.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 22, 1994.
Before RICH, ARCHER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36