United States v. Sepulveda-Buitrago, 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Sepulveda-Buitrago, 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Digitel Corp. v. DeltaCom, Inc. (almd, 1996-11-14) · Strongest negative: First Miami Securities, Inc. v. Bell (fladistctapp, 2000-05-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" First Miami Securities, Inc. v. Bell
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hagerty, 808 F.Supp. 1555, 1557 (S.D.Fla.1992), aff'd, 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" Digitel Corp. v. DeltaCom, Inc.
M.D. Ala. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hagerty, 808 F.Supp. 1555, 1560 (S.D.Fla.1992) (determining that “[t]he harm to the defendants] ... is mitigated by [their] ability to solicit new clients.”), aff'd, 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" Php Healthcare Corporation v. Emsa Limited Partnership
4th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hagerty, 808 F.Supp. 1555 (S.D.Fla.1992), aff'd, 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir.1993); MedX, Inc. v. Ranger, 788 F.Supp. 288, 290-91 (E.D.La.1992). 6 .It's of course possible that the language of a particular covenant might raise significant questions about the scope of the "specific business” it seeks to protect against competition, hence of the "like” business whose continuation by the employer would entitle it to enforce the covenant under the Florida statute.
discussed Cited "see" AmeriGas Propane, Inc. v. Crook
M.D. Tenn. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hagerty, 808 F.Supp. 1555, 1559-60 (S.D.Fla.1992), aff'd 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir.1993) (rejecting argument that no irreparable injury could be shown where there was difficulty in determining the period of time for which customers would be lost and the amount of business that would have ensued but for defendants’ illegal conduct).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wells v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
E.D. Ky. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Ruscitto v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 777 F.Supp. 1349 (ND.Tex.), aff'd., 948 F.2d 1286 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 930 , 112 S.Ct. 1994 , 118 L.Ed.2d 590 (1992), and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hagerty, 808 F.Supp. 1555 (S.D.Fla.1993), aff'd., 2 F.3d 405 (11th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Sepulveda-Buitrago
92-4703.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 9, 1993.
2 F.3d 405
Published

2 F.3d 405

U.S.
v.
Sepulveda-Buitrago***

NO. 92-4703

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Aug 09, 1993

1

Appeal From: S.D.Fla.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3

**

Local Rule 36 case