Robert Devereaux v. Robert Ricardo Perez, 235 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert Devereaux v. Robert Ricardo Perez, 235 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“devereaux i”
7 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Devereaux v. Abbey (ca9, 2001-09-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Devereaux v. Abbey (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
9th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
devereaux i
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Devereaux v. Abbey (2×) also: Cited "see"
9th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
We subsequently granted rehearing en banc. 235 F.3d at 1206.
Robert Devereaux
v.
Robert Ricardo Perez, Kenneth Badgley, in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Wenatchee Earl Tilly, in His Official Capacity as Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Wenatchee City of Wenatchee, a Municipal Corporation, Timothy David Abbey Laurie Alexander Kate Carrow Linda Woods State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services
97-35781.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 19, 2000.
235 F.3d 1206
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: #5,305 of 633,719
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

235 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2000)

ROBERT DEVEREAUX, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT RICARDO PEREZ, KENNETH BADGLEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF WENATCHEE; EARL TILLY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER FOR THE CITY OF WENATCHEE; CITY OF WENATCHEE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
TIMOTHY DAVID ABBEY; LAURIE ALEXANDER; KATE CARROW; LINDA WOODS; STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 97-35781

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

December 19, 2000

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,[1] it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Tallman was recused.