green
Positive treatment
12.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Macias-Ramos v. Schiltgen
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Guadalupe-Cruz, 240 F.3d at 1212.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Balabekyan v. Ashcroft
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
“Had the IJ relied on pre-IIRIRA law as he should have, [the Balabekyans] would have met the pre-IIRIRA continuous physical presence requirement.” See Guadalupe-Cruz, 240 F.3d at 1211.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Julio Cesar Otarola v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(6×)
Id. at 1210.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rivera-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Guadalupe-Cruz, 240 F.3d at 1211-12 (noting that “if the IJ had followed the pre-IIRIRA law and granted Petitioners’ suspension applications, the INS could have appealed”).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
In Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir.2001), an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) applied a stop-clock rule set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRI-RA”) to the petitioners’ suspension of deportation applications even though IIRIRA had not yet gone into effect. 3 Id. at 1210.
discussed
Cited "see"
Navarro v. Mukasey
(2×)
See Matter of N-J-B-, 21 I. & N. Dec. 812, 814 (1997), abrogated by Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1212, as amended by 250 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir.2001) (subsequently holding that the BIA's interpretation was in error and offering relief to those whose applications were wrongly denied).
discussed
Cited "see"
Navarro v. Mukasey
See Matter of N-J-B-, 21 I. & N. Dec. 812, 814 (1997), abrogated by Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1212, as amended by 250 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2001) (subsequently holding that the BIA’s interpretation was in error and offering relief to those whose applications were wrongly denied).
cited
Cited "see"
Velazquez-Castillo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Alam v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1211-12 (9th Cir.), as amended, 250 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Pellicer v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1212 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Arroyo-Gomez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1212 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Villatoro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1211-12 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia-Munoz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Castro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1211-1213 (9th Cir.2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alejandro Reyes-Melendez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Colmenar, 210 F.3d at 971 ; see also Guadalupe-Cruz v. INS, 240 F.3d 1209 , 1211 (9th Cir.2002) (holding BIA erred by failing to consider the due process claim despite its affirmance of the IJ decision on separate statutory grounds); SanchezCruz, 255 F.3d at 778 (considering due process claim even though IJ denied relief on discretionary basis).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maria Guadalupe-Cruz Patricia Flores, A.K.A. Patricia Flores-Cruz Maria Guadalupe-Flores
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
99-70754.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 27, 2001.
240 F.3d 1209
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
240 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir. 2001)
MARIA GUADALUPE-CRUZ; PATRICIA FLORES, A.K.A. PATRICIA FLORES-CRUZ; MARIA GUADALUPE-FLORES, PETITIONERS,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT.
No. 99-70754
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted November 2, 2000
February 27, 2001
1
NOTE: SEE CORRECTED OPINION AT 250 F.3d 1271.