Green v. Anderson, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Green v. Anderson, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roe v. Anderson (ca9, 1998-01-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Roe v. Anderson
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516, 518-23 (E.D.Cal.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir.1994), vacated as unripe, 513 U.S. 557 , 115 S.Ct. 1059 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1995). 3 Brenda Roe and Anna Doe, different plaintiffs than those in Green v. Anderson, commenced the instant action on April 1, 1997, each having recently moved to California seeking employment and being eligible for assistance.
discussed Cited "see" Roe v. Anderson
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516, 518-23 (E.D.Cal.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir.1994), vacated as unripe, 513 U.S. 557 , 115 S.Ct. 1059 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1995). 3 8 Brenda Roe and Anna Doe, different plaintiffs than those in Green v. Anderson, commenced the instant action on April 1, 1997, each having recently moved to California seeking employment and being eligible for assistance.
cited Cited "see" Roe v. Anderson
E.D. Cal. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir.1994), vacated as unripe sub nom, Anderson v. Green, 513 U.S. 557 , 115 S.Ct. 1059 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Beno v. Shalala
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" Beno v. Shalala
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sanchez v. Department of Human Services
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993), aff'd, 26 F.3d 95 (9th Cir.1994), vacated as unripe sub nom, Anderson v. Green, 513 U.S. 557 , 115 S.Ct. 1059 , 130 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deshawn Green, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Situated
v.
Eloise Anderson, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Director, California Department of Social Services California Department of Social Services and Thomas Hayes, Director, California Department of Finance
93-15306.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 13, 1994.
26 F.3d 95
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

26 F.3d 95

Deshawn GREEN, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on
behalf of themselves and all others situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Eloise ANDERSON, individually and in her official capacity
as Director, California Department of Social Services;
California Department of Social Services; and Thomas Hayes,
Director, California Department of Finance, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 93-15306.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994.
Decided April 29, 1994.
Amended June 13, 1994.

Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants.

Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case.

2

This Court's Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words "the preliminary injunction" between "AFFIRM" and "for."

3

The April 29, 1994 Order is redesignated ORDER FOR PUBLICATION.