Auto-Shade, Inc. v. Auto-Sun-Shade, Inc., A/K/A Intertek Int'l Corp. & Ezia David S. Eskandry, A/K/A David Alexander, Defendants/cross-Appellants, 31 F.3d 1178 (Fed. Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Auto-Shade, Inc. v. Auto-Sun-Shade, Inc., A/K/A Intertek Int'l Corp. & Ezia David S. Eskandry, A/K/A David Alexander, Defendants/cross-Appellants, 31 F.3d 1178 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robert W. Kearns v. Wood Motors, Inc., Daimler-Benz Aktiengeselschaft, and Dr. Ing. H.C.F. Porsche A.G. (cafc, 1997-01-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Robert W. Kearns v. Wood Motors, Inc., Daimler-Benz Aktiengeselschaft, and Dr. Ing. H.C.F. Porsche A.G.
Fed. Cir. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kearns v. General Motors, Corp., 31 F.3d 1178 (table), 33 USPQ2d 1696, 1698 (Fed.Cir.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Auto-Shade, Inc.
v.
Auto-Sun-Shade, Inc., A/K/A Intertek International Corporation and Ezia David S. Eskandry, A/K/A David Alexander, Defendants/cross-Appellants
94-1007.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jul 28, 1994.
31 F.3d 1178
Unpublished

31 F.3d 1178

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
AUTO-SHADE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AUTO-SUN-SHADE, INC., a/k/a Intertek International
Corporation and Ezia David S. Eskandry, a/k/a
David Alexander, Defendants/Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 94-1007, 94-1008.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 28, 1994.

Before NIES, MAYER, and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.