Arthur O. Klein v. Bruce A. Lehman, Comm'r of Patents & Trademarks, 47 F.3d 1180 (Fed. Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Arthur O. Klein v. Bruce A. Lehman, Comm'r of Patents & Trademarks, 47 F.3d 1180 (Fed. Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Haden Schweitzer Corp. v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc. (mied, 1995-06-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Haden Schweitzer Corp. v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Centigram Communications Corp. v. Lehman, 862 F.Supp. 113, 114-16 (E.D.Va.1994), appeal dismissed, 47 F.3d 1180 (Fed.Cir.1995) and Laerdal Medical Corp. v. Ambu, Inc., 877 F.Supp. 255, 256-57 (D.Md.1995) for a discussion of § 41’s history. “[T]he purpose of implementing such a maintenance fee system was to have patent owners pay for certain operations of the PTO.” Id. at 256.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arthur O. Klein
v.
Bruce A. Lehman, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
94-1389.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 10, 1995.
47 F.3d 1180
Unpublished

47 F.3d 1180

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Arthur O. KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bruce A. LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1389.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1995.

1

APPEAL DEACTIVATED.

ORDER

2

On consideration of the notice of appeal, a motion of the type enumerated in Fed. R. App. P. 4 (a)(4) having been filed in the United States District Court / DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA rendering the notice of appeal ineffective, it is

3

ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, DEACTIVATED.

4

The appeal will be REACTIVATED upon entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding.