green
Positive treatment
11.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Brian Mooney v. Social Security Administration
See Hicks v. Department of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994), aff’d, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Karen Salyer v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
IAF, Tab 6 at 6-7; PFR File, Tab 1 at 20-23; see Hicks v. Department of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994), aff’d 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary Riley v. United States Postal Service
IAF, Tab 4 at 37; see Hicks v. Department of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994) (finding that an agency is required to prove only the essence of its charge and need not prove each factual specification in support of the charge), aff’d, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Yaw Obeng v. Department of Commerce
See Hicks v. Department of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994), aff’d, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Arvind I. Patel v. United States Postal Service
Otero, 73 M.S.P.R. at 204; see Hicks v. Department of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994), aff’d, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
See International Transducer Corp. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 522, 530 (1994), aff'd, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.Cir.1995) (table).
cited
Cited "see"
Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
See International Transducer Corp. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 522, 526 (1994), aff'd, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.Cir.1995) (table).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marcus Swearengen v. Department of the Army
See, e.g., Hicks v. Department of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994) (stating that an agency is required to prove only the essence of the charge and need not prove each factual specification supporting the charge), aff’d, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chambers v. Department of the Interior
See also Hides v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994), aff'd, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.Cir.1995). 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chambers v. Department of the Interior
See also Hicks v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 62 M.S.P.R. 71 , 74 (1994), aff'd, 48 F.3d 1235 (Fed.Cir.1995). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Key West
v.
United States
v.
United States
94-5096.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 8, 1995.
Published
48 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
CITY OF KEY WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-5096.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 8, 1995.
Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.