green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Duke v. Collier
See Payne v. Speer, 74 F.3d 1238, 1238 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing Lozano v. Smith, 718 F.2d 756, 768 (5th Cir. 1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rentas-Felix
See, United States v. Koetting, 74 F.3d 1238 (5th Cir. December 8, 1995)(no Brady claim considering that defendant did not explain why notes and reports at issue were potentially exculpatory or impeaching). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.
See McDaniel v. Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, 877 F.Supp. 321, 328 (S.D.Miss.1994), aff'd, 74 F.3d 1238 (5th Cir.1995) (employee who was drug-free for six weeks and had completed two-and-a-half week inpatient drug treatment was still “current user” and not covered by ADA).
cited
Cited "see"
Cir.1993); Sharp v. Puckett, 930 F.2d 450, 452 (5th Cir.1991) (holding that when counsel denied the
See United States v. Bergeron, 74 F.3d 1238 (5th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care Centre
See, e.g., McDaniel v. Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, 877 F.Supp. 321, 326 (S.D.Miss.) (plaintiff must be a "qualified individual with a disability” at the time the adverse action occurred), aff 'd, 74 F.3d 1238 (5th Cir.1995); Parker v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U.S
v.
Rojas
v.
Rojas
95-10266.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 5, 1995.
Unpublished
U.S.
v.
Rojas
NO. 95-10266
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec 08, 1995
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 2:91-CR-26
1
AFFIRMED.