William E. Perkins v. Educ. Testing Serv., 79 F.3d 1138 (3rd Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
William E. Perkins v. Educ. Testing Serv., 79 F.3d 1138 (3rd Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kool, Mann, Coffee Co. v. Coffey (ca3, 2002-07-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kool, Mann, Coffee Co. v. Coffey (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kool, Mann, 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir. 1996).
cited Cited "see" Kool, Mann, Coffee & Co., F/d/b/a Moore, Owen, Thomas & Co., and Thomas O. Moore v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey, in No. 01-4052 (d.c. Civil No. 99-Cv-00058) Moore, Owen, Thomas & Co. And Thomas O. Moore v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey (d.c. Civil No. 99-Cv-00204) Moore, Owen, Thomas & Co. And Thomas O. Moore v. Robert Bruce Coffey (d.c. Civil No. 00 Cv-00230) Kool, Mann, Coffee & Co., F/d/b/a Moore, Owen, Thomas & Co., in No. 01-4066
3rd Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Kool, Mann, 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Emcore Corp. v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
D.N.J. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Metcalf v. PaineWebber Inc., 886 F.Supp. 503, 512-14 (W.D.Pa.1995) (to satisfy distinctiveness requirement, "a complaint must include an allegation that the enterprise included some person or entity operating outside of the defendant’s or defendants’ normal scope of business”), aff'd, 79 F.3d 1138 (3rd Cir.1996); see also Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp., 30 F.Supp.2d 673, 699-702 (D.Del. 1998).
cited Cited "see" Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp.
D. Del. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Metcalf v. PaineWebber Inc., 886 F.Supp. 503, 513 (W.D.Pa.1995), aff'd without op., 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996) (table).
discussed Cited "see" Brannon v. Boatmen's First National Bank
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Metcalf v. PaineWebber Inc., 886 F.Supp. 503 , 514 n. 12 (W.D.Pa.1995) (concluding that the holding in Jaguar Cars cannot be extended to corporate defendants), off'd mem., 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996). 5 .
discussed Cited "see" Brannon v. Boatmen's First Nat'l Bank Of Oklahoma
1st Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Metcalf v. PaineWebber Inc., 886 F.Supp. 503 , 514 n. 12 (W.D.Pa.1995) (concluding that the holding in Jaguar Cars cannot be extended to corporate defendants), aff'd mem., 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996) 5 Under § 1961(5) a "pattern of racketeering activity" requires "at least two acts of racketeering activity." 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (5); see also Sedima, 473 U.S. at 496 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. 3275 (discussing definition of "pattern of racketeering activity")
discussed Cited "see" Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.
D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Metcalf v. PaineWebber, Inc., 886 F.Supp. 503 , 513-14 & n. 12 (W.D.Pa.1995) (construing Jaguar Cars as limited to distinctiveness issues related to corporate officers and employees), aff’d without op., 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996) (table); see also Brannon v. Boatmens Bancshares, Inc., 952 F.Supp. *489 1478, 1486-87 (W.D.Okla.1997) (construing Jaguar Cars similarly and noting that Metcalf, 886 F.Supp. at 513 -14 refused to extend the holding in Jaguar Cars to corporate entities).
discussed Cited "see" COR Marketing & Sales, Inc. v. Greyhawk Corp.
W.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ono v. Itoyama, 884 F.Supp. 892, 899 (D.N.J.1995), aff 'd 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996) (action by one 50% shareholder in the name of the corporation against the other 50% shareholder properly converted to a shareholder derivative action, applying New York law, where demand on board would have been futile).
cited Cited "see" Torelli v. Torelli
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ono v. Itoyama, 884 F.Supp. 892 (D.N.J.1995), aff'd, 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" Rowe v. Romano
E.D. Pa. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Piergrossi v. Karcewski, 1995 WL 318797 , *7 (E.D.Pa.1995), aff'd., 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bartlett v. Overslaugh
D.D.C. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
New York law on this point is clear — “a shareholder derivative action is an appropriate method for one fifty-percent shareholder to obtain relief in the name of the corporation against the other fifty-percent shareholder.” Barry v. Curtin, 993 F.Supp.2d 347, 352-53 (E.D.N.Y.2014), quoting Tuscano v. Tuscano, 403 F.Supp.2d 214, 222 (E.D.N.Y.2005); see also Ono v. Itoyama, 884 F.Supp. 892, 895 (D.N.J.1995) (citing “ample authority” under New York law for the proposition that a derivative action, not a direct action, is the appropriate remedy in a dispute between 50% shareholders), aff…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Friedland v. Unum Group
D. Del. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cedric Kushner Promotions, 533 U.S. at 163 , 121 S.Ct. 2087 ; see also Metcalf v. PaineWebber Inc., 886 F.Supp. 503, 513-14 (W.D.Pa.1995), aff'd without op., 79 F.3d 1138 (3d Cir.1996) (stating that in order “to satisfy the enterprise requirement, a complaint must include an allegation that the enterprise included some person or entity operating outside of the ... defendants’ normal scope of business”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William E. Perkins
v.
Educational Testing Service
95-5403.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 20, 1996.
79 F.3d 1138
Published

79 F.3d 1138

131 Lab.Cas. P 58,102

William E. Perkins
v.
Educational Testing Service

NO. 95-5403

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Feb 20, 1996

Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-4609(MLP)

1

AFFIRMED.