Michael McRae v. State of Maryland, Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs. Attorney Gen. of the State of Maryland, 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Michael McRae v. State of Maryland, Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs. Attorney Gen. of the State of Maryland, 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Consolidation Coal Co. v. Kramer (ca3, 2002-09-24) · Strongest negative: Boone v. Mountainmade Foundation (dcd, 2014-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Boone v. Mountainmade Foundation
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: but see · confidence high
Mar. 25, 1999) (denying summary judgment when plaintiff alleged that her employer moved her shift to accommodate her school schedule and refused to move her shift back after *245 classes were finished which was the arrangement that she anticipated); but see Long v. First Union Corp., 894 F.Supp. 933 (E.D.Va.1995), aff'd 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir.Va.1996) (holding that while there was sufficient evidence to conclude that plaintiff quit after her employer would not accommodate her school schedule, plaintiff could have remained in her position and worked the hours already assigned to her, and did not…
cited Cited "see" Consolidation Coal Co. v. Kramer
3rd Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 7 .
discussed Cited "see" Consolidation Coal Company v. Kramer
3rd Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 7 In reaching his decision, the administrative law judge has discretion to accord varying weight to physician testimony See 20 C.F.R. § 718.206 ; Kertesz v. Crescent Hills Coal Co., 788 F.2d 158 (3d Cir.1986) (noting that an administrative law judge is not bound to accept the opinion or theory of any medical expert, but may weigh the medical evidence and draw his own inferences). 8 Wecht testified that the microscopic portion of the autopsy report referred to findings that confirmed the gross autopsy, and that he only includes additional detail in the microscopic description if micros…
discussed Cited "see" Chergosky v. Hodges
E.D.N.C. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lassiter v. Reno, 885 F.Supp. 869 (E.D.Va.1995), aff'd, 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir.1996),- cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 766 , 136 L.Ed.2d 712 (1997) (non-agency head defendants motion to dismiss granted because defendants not proper parties to the action); Soto v. U.S. Postal Serv., 905 F.2d 537 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1027 , 111 S.Ct. 679 , 112 L.Ed.2d 671 (1991) (Postmaster General only properly named defendant in Title VII employment discrimination action against USPS by former postal worker); Mahoney v. U.S. Postal Serv., 884 F.2d 1194 (9th Cir.1989) (same). 1 This Court…
cited Cited "see" Manning v. Hunt
4th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. Hunt, Nos. 95-3181, 95-3182, 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir. May 22, 1996).
cited Cited "see" Manning v. Hunt
4th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. Hunt, Nos. 95-3181, 95-3182, 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir. May 22, 1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Velasquez v. Goldwater Memorial Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Neither the statute nor common understanding equates national origin with the language that one chooses to speak.” Garcia v. Gloor, 618 F.2d 264, 268 (5th Cir.1980); see also Long v. First Union Corp. of Virginia, 894 F.Supp. 933, 941 (E.D.Va.1995), aff 'd 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir.1996) (“There is nothing in Title VII which protects or provides that an employee has a right to speak his or her native tongue while on the job.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rivera v. Heyman
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See DiPompo, 708 F.Supp. at 547 ; see also Lassiter v. Reno, 885 F.Supp. 869, 872-73 (E.D.Va.1995), aff'd, 86 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 766 , 136 L.Ed.2d 712 (1997) (dismissing state human rights claims made by disabled federal employee). 11 *941 Plaintiff contends that Palau and Dolan may be sued in their individual capacities under the human rights laws.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael McRae
v.
State of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services Attorney General of the State of Maryland
95-3122.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 28, 1996.
86 F.3d 1151
Unpublished

86 F.3d 1151

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael MCRAE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Maryland, Department of Public Safety and
Correctional Services; Attorney General of the
State of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-3122.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided May 28, 1996.

Michael McRae, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McRae v. Maryland, No. CA-95-3388-S (D.Md. Nov. 21, 1995). We note that to the extent Appellant sought reconsideration of the district court's dismissal of his prior action, rather than to file a new action, relief was properly denied. Appellant presented no information to support a finding that the district court abused its discretion in determining that Appellant's first action was untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED