green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Mull v. Houston Indep Sch Dist
See Rife v. City of Dallas, 91 F.3d 139 (5th Cir. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morales v. Carrillo
See Rife v. City of Dallas, 91 F.3d 139, 139 (5th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (finding probable cause existed when a suspect was stopped for speeding, “smelled of alcohol,” and “had bloodshot eyes and stumbling speech”); Forbes v. Harris County, Texas, No. CV H-17-2256, 2019 WL 2085670 , at *7-8 (S.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Cobb, 91 F.3d 139 (5th Cir.1996) (unpublished opinion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shaughnessy
Coleman, 78 F.3d 154, 156 ; see also, e.g., United States v. Valdez-Anguiano, 91 F.3d 139 , 1996 WL 400195 at *4 (5th Cir. 1996) (unpublished) (finding evidence of defendant’s possession of $289,000 in $20 bills was intrinsic to a drug-trafficking conspiracy); United States v. Mendez, 643 F. App’x 418, 427 (5th Cir. 2016) (holding that a jury could reasonably find that $150,000 recovered during the traffic stop constituted proceeds of the drug conspiracy and was therefore intrinsic to the charged offense). 14 Case: 24-10126 Document: 84-1 Page: 15 Date Filed: 10/02/2025 No. 24-10126 Becaus…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rife
v.
Dallas Tx City of
v.
Dallas Tx City of
95-10560.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 17, 1996.
91 F.3d 139
Cited by 1 opinion | Unpublished
Rife
v.
City of Dallas, Texas[*]
NO. 95-10560
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
June 12, 1996
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:93-CV-2425
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2