United States v. Michael Bryant Brumley, 91 F.3d 676 (5th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
United States v. Michael Bryant Brumley, 91 F.3d 676 (5th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Clinton Manges David Wayne Myers and Carl Hubert Shanklin (ca5, 1997-05-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Clinton Manges David Wayne Myers and Carl Hubert Shanklin
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brumley (Brumley I), 59 F.3d 517, 520-22 (5th Cir.1995), opinion, withdrawn and superseded on reh’g, 79 F.3d 1430, 1432 (5th Cir.1996), opinion vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 91 F.3d 676 (5th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLINTON MANGES; DAVID WAYNE MYERS; and CARL HUBERT SHANKLIN
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brumley (Brumley I), 59 F.3d 517, 520-22 (5th Cir. 1995), opinion withdrawn and superseded on reh’g, 79 F.3d 1430, 1432 (5th Cir. 1996), opinion vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 91 F.3d 676 (5th Cir. 1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Michael Bryant Brumley
94-40560.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 17, 1996.
91 F.3d 676
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

91 F.3d 676

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Bryant BRUMLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-40560.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 17, 1996.

Mervyn J. Hamburg, United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, DC, Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Lon Stuart Platt, Office of the United States Attorney, Tyler, TX; Carol Kay Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, United States Attorneys Office, Sherman, TX, for U.S.

George Michael Jamail, Bernsen, Jamail & Goodson, Beaumont, TX, for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Richard A. Schell, Chief Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 28, 1996, 5 Cir., 1996,

79 F.3d 1430)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.