Unknown, 96 F.3d 1445. · Go Syfert
Search
Unknown, 96 F.3d 1445. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“unless otherwise specified in the order of dismissal, a dismissal under rule 41(b) operates as . . . a dismissal with prejudice.”
64 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Martinez v. Social Security Administration (txwd, 2024-03-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Martinez v. Social Security Administration
W.D. Tex. · 2024 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
unless otherwise specified in the order of dismissal, a dismissal under rule 41(b) operates as . . . a dismissal with prejudice.
discussed Cited "see" Cotemar S.A. De C.V. v. Beaufort
E.D. La. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See L & L Oil Co., Inc. v. M/V REBEL, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996); Ambassador Factors v. Rhein-, Maas-, Und See-Schiffahrtskontor GMBH (Vormals Sanara Reedereikontor GMBS), 105 F.3d 1397 (11th Cir.1997).
cited Cited "see" Holford v. Exhibit Design Consultants
W.D. Mich. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996) (citing Truesdale v. Pacific Holding Co./Hay Adams Div., 778 F.Supp. 77, 81-82 (D.D.C.1991)).
cited Cited "see" Torres-Negron v. Ramallo Bros. Printing, Inc.
D.P.R. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996) (citing Truesdale v. Pacific Holding Co./Hay Adams Div., 778 F.Supp. 77, 81-82 (D.D.C.1991)).
cited Cited "see" Mattson v. Farrell Distributing Corp.
D. Vt. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 237 (W.D.Tex.), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996); Miles v. N.Y.
cited Cited "see" Shafrir v. Association of Reform Zionists of America
S.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Vanderhoof v. Life Extension Institute
D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996); Jachim v. KUTV Inc., 783 F.Supp. 1328, 1333 (D.Utah 1992); Truesdale v. Pacific Holding Co./Hay Adams Div., 778 F.Supp. 77, 81 (D.D.C.1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Granger v. Moneymaker
W.D. La. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
P. 41(b); see also Love v. Hunt, 96 F.3d 1445 (Sth Cir. 1996) (“Unless otherwise specified in the order of dismissal, a dismissal under Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on the merits, and thus as a dismissal with prejudice.”’) 8 Long v. Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880 (Sth Cir. 1996); Nottingham at 440; Burden v. Yates, 644 F.2d 503, 505 (Sth Cir. 1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Association of Taxicab Operators v. Yellow Checker Cab Co. of Dallas/Fort Worth, Inc.
N.D. Tex. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996) (affirming grant of summary judgment when district court accepted movant’s evidence as undisputed after nonnmovant failed to respond).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
96 F.3d 1445
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: W.D. Texas (1)

96 F.3d 1445

Carter
v.
Potter County Sheriff[*]

NO. 95-11037

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug 30, 1996

Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 2:93-CV-339

1

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2