Mackey v. Cason, Johnson & Co., 41 S.E. 620 (Ga. 1902). · Go Syfert
Search
Mackey v. Cason, Johnson & Co., 41 S.E. 620 (Ga. 1902). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. C. I. T. Corp. (ga, 1938-05-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Smith v. C. I. T. Corp.
Ga. · 1938 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baston v. Rabun, 115 Ga. 378 ( 41 S. E. 568 ); Barbour v. Day Co., 37 Ga. App. 267 ( 139 S. E. 909 ); Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co., 45 Ga. App. 754 (6) ( 166 S. E. 34 ); Code, § 107-104. 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mackey
v.
Cason, Johnson & Company
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Apr 28, 1902.
41 S.E. 620
B. W. Boyd, A. A. McGurry, and A. G. & J. B. McGurry, for plaintiff in error. W. L. Hodges and J. H. Skelton, contra.
Fish, Lewis.
Published
Fish, J.

The charge excepted to was not erroneous, nor was it, in view of the pleadings and evidence, open to the objection that it too greatly restricted the jury in passing upon the issues involved. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.