Ogletree v. Ellington, 83 S.E. 520 (Ga. 1914). · Go Syfert
Search
Ogletree v. Ellington, 83 S.E. 520 (Ga. 1914). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Coates v. Lawrence (gasd, 1942-10-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1914 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1914 1970 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Coates v. Lawrence
S.D. Ga. · 1942 · confidence medium
Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211 , 36 S.Ct. 595 , 60 L.Ed. 961 , Ann.Cas.1916E, 505, L.R.A. 1917A, 86 ; Betts v. Brady, 62 S.Ct. 1252, 1256 , 86 L.Ed. —, decided June 1, 1942; Griffin v. State, 142 Ga. 636, 637 (2), 83 S.E. 540 , L.R.A.1915C, 716, Ann.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Woodward v. Stewart
Ga. · 1919 · confidence medium
But in some, probably most, of the cases so declaring, it will be found that the failure of directors to use ordinary care in supervision has been treated as amounting to gross negligence.” This case was cited with approval in Griffin v. State, 142 Ga. 636, 640 ( 83 S. E. 540 , L.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Park v. First National Bank
Ga. Ct. App. · 1919 · confidence medium
Griffin v. State, 142 Ga. 636, 646 ( 83 S. E. 540 , L.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Kunsberg v. State
Ga. · 1918 · confidence medium
State, 142 Ga. 636, 639 ( 83 S. E. 540 , L.
cited Cited "see" People v. Troche
Cal. · 1928 · signal: see · confidence high
See Griffin v. State, 142 Ga. 636 [Ann.
cited Cited "see" Spence v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1917 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in this connection, the decision of 'the Supreme Court, in reference to certified questions from this court, in the Griffin case, 142 Ga. 636 (4), 646 ( 83 S. E. 540 , L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ogletree
v.
Ellington
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 11, 1914.
83 S.E. 520
A. G. Golucke and S. H. Sibley, for plaintiff in error., E. P. Davis and Hawes Cloud, contra.
Atkinson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Atkinson, J.

1. A habeas-corpus proceeding was instituted by the father of a two-year-old girl child, against the maternal grandmother, to recover possession of the child, at the trial of which the defendant set up a right to the possession, based on an alleged gift by the father when the child was two days old, acceptance of the gift, and subsequent support of the child. Though conflicting, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the judge to find that there was a gift of the child.

2. The evidence was of such character as would have authorized the judge to find that either party would be a proper person to have possession of the child.

3. The evidence which was admitted over objection, upon which error was assigned, was not of such character as would require a reversal of the judgment on account of any error in the ruling of the court admitting it.

4. There was no abuse of discretion in awarding the custody of the child to the defendant. Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur.