green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1924 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1924
1975
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bulman v. First National Bank
(2×)
See Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Friedlander, 30 Ga. App. 312 ( 117 SE 762 ) [affirmed in Friedlander v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 158 Ga. 303 ( 122 SE 890 )] which held that even OCGA § 7-4-17 (Code Ann. § 57-109) does not prohibit a creditor from applying payment on the principal first.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodgers v. Styles
(2×)
See also L. & N. Railroad Co. v. Dixon, 158 Ga. 303 ( 123 S. E. 12 ), and Hinson v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co., 38 Ga. App. 516 (1) ( 144 S. E. 384 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
v.
Dickson Ryals v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Company
v.
Dickson Ryals v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Company
Nos. 3867, 3868.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
May 14, 1924.
Miles W. Lewis and li. L. & II. 0. Qox, for L. & N. E. Co., J. G. KnoXj for Dickson., Crum & Jones and Stephen Lace, for Eyals., W. W. Lyles, for S. A.-L. Ey. Co.
Pee.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Pee Curiam.
Under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910),a§ 5517, the vendor of an automobile, who has retained title therein, has a right as owner of the legal title, in the event of the injury or destruction of such automobile, to maintain an action for the tort, and is entitled to recover such damages as he may have sustained by reason of the injury or destruction of the personalty to which he has retained or holds title, provided the damages recovered do not exceed the purchase-price; and it is not necessary to join the purchaser in the suit.
All the Justices concur. Miles W. Lewis and li. L. & II. 0. Qox, for L. & N. E. Co. J. G. KnoXj for Dickson. Crum & Jones and Stephen Lace, for Eyals. W. W. Lyles, for S. A.-L. Ey. Co.