West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of West Virginia, 348 U.S. 881 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of West Virginia, 348 U.S. 881 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Albert Houston Carter v. United States (ca5, 1963-12-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Albert Houston Carter v. United States (2×)
5th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rice v. Sioux City Cemetery, 1954, 348 U.S. 880 , 75 S.Ct. 122 , 99 L.Ed. 693 , on rehearing, 1955, 349 U.S. 70 , 73, 75 S.Ct. 614 , 99 L.Ed. 897 , 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 902, pp. 338, 339. 2 Affirmed. 3 RIVES, CAMERON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, concur. 4 JONES, Circuit Judge, concurs specially. 5 TUTTLE, BELL, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, dissent.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brower v. Brown (2×)
Utah · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc., 348 U.S. 880 , 75 S.Ct. 122 , 99 L.Ed. 693 (1954), cert. dismissed, 349 U.S. 70 , 75 S.Ct. 614 , 99 L.Ed. 897 (1955); Ferguson v. Rockwell International Corp., 734 P.2d 131 (Colo.Ct.App.1986).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Silesian Holding Co. v. Union Bank of Switzerland
SCOTUS · 1955 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also 348 U. S. 881 , 948.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
West Virginia Motor Truck Association, Inc.
v.
Public Service Commission of West Virginia
No. 418.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1954.
348 U.S. 881
Francis W. Mclnerny and David G. Macdonald for appellants., John G. Fox, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Amos A. Bolen for appellees.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.