green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Smelser v. United States
See National Presto Industries, Inc. v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 749 , 338 F.2d 99, 106-07 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 1105 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965) (stating that “Courts generally, as well as this court, have been wary in granting relief from innocent mutual mistakes imbedded in ... contracts”).
cited
Cited "see"
Peterson Builders, Inc. v. United States
See National Presto Indus. v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 749, 764 , 338 F.2d 99, 109 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 1105 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Westgate, Ltd. v. State
(2×)
See City of Houston v. Biggers, 380 S.W.2d 700 (Tex.Civ.App.Houston 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 1105 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965); State v. Vaughan, 319 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.Civ.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dillard v. Austin Independent School District
See City of Houston v. Biggers, 380 S.W.2d 700, 704 (Tex.App.1964, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 1105 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965), cited with approval in City of Austin v. Teague, 570 S.W.2d 389, 392 (Tex.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Cassity v. Gulf States Utilities Co.
See City of Houston v. Biggers, 380 S.W.2d 700 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1964, writ ref’d n. r. e.), cert. den. 380 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 1105 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 .
cited
Cited "see"
Motel Corporation v. Motel Corporation
See Olympic Finance Co. v. Thyret, 337 F.2d 62, 68 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965); Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. U. S. A. Motel Corp.
See Olympic Finance Co. v. Thyret, 337 F.2d 62, 68 (9th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965); Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Guerrant
See Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910, 912 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles R. Hassinger, Administrator of the Estate of Stanley H. Hassinger, III Janet Mead Proctor, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Diego Proctor and James B. Powell, Administrator of the Estate of Stuart L. Powell v. Tideland Electric Membership Corporation, and Coleman Company, Inc. And Coast Catamaran Corporation, Charles R. Hassinger, Administrator of the Estate of Stanley H. Hassinger, III Janet Meade Proctor, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Diego Proctor and James B. Powell, Administrator of the Estate of Stuart L. Powell v. Tideland Electric Membership Corporation, and Coleman Company, Inc. And Coast Catamaran Corporation
Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles, 296 U.S. 10, 26 , 56 S.Ct. 23, 31 , 80 L.Ed. 9 (1935); see also Leslie Salt Co. v. Froehlke, 578 F.2d 742 (9th Cir.1978), where the Court observed, 578 F.2d at 750 , that after Borax, "the test of the mean high water mark became the inveterate standard to be applied in limiting federal authority over navigable waters." 8 It follows that "navigable water" and thus the boundary of admiralty jurisdiction in tidal areas does not ebb and flow with the tide but extends to the mean high water mark at all times, because "[w]hether, at the time the injur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp.
Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles, 296 U.S. 10, 26 , 56 S.Ct. 23, 31 , 80 L.Ed. 9 (1935); see also Leslie Salt Co. v. Froehlke, 578 F.2d 742 (9th Cir.1978), where the Court observed, 578 F.2d at 750 , that after Borax, “the test of the mean high water mark became the inveterate standard to be applied in limiting federal authority over navigable waters.” It follows that “navigable water” and thus the boundary of admiralty jurisdiction in tidal areas does not ebb and flow with the tide but extends to the mean high water mark at all times, because “[wjheth er, at the time …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirkaldy v. Alamo Chemical Transportation Co.
See, e. g., Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910 (4th Cir.), cert. den., 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Guillory v. Levingston Shipbuilding Co.
See, e.g., Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C. C. Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation
See, e. g., Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George Bennett, an Individual D/B/A George Bennett Construction Company v. The United States
See also National Presto Indus., Inc. v. United States, 338 F.2d 99, 103 , 167 Ct.Cl. 749, 755 , footnote 2 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 1105 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hastings
v.
Mann, trading as Mann's Harbor Marina
v.
Mann, trading as Mann's Harbor Marina
No. 911.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1965.
Walter B. Martin, Jr., for petitioner. Gerald F. White for respondent.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.