Eisinger v. Comm'r, 356 U.S. 913 (1958). · Go Syfert
Eisinger v. Comm'r, 356 U.S. 913 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Carl P. Fogel (cadc, 1987-09-15) · Strongest negative: Rice v. Simpson (almd, 1967-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Rice v. Simpson
M.D. Ala. · 1967 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Hayes v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 249 F.2d 516, 517 , cert. den. 356 U.S. 914 , 78 S.Ct. 672 , 2 L.Ed.2d 586 .
cited Cited "but see" Pasquale J. Marano, Jr. v. United States
1st Cir. · 1967 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Hayes v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 249 F.2d 516, 517 , cert. den. 356 U.S. 914 , 78 S.Ct. 672 , 2 L.Ed.2d 586 .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Carl P. Fogel
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a sentence which does not conform with the applicable statute may be corrected though defendant ... has begun to serve it
cited Cited "see" United States v. Alonzo Pena Caldera, United States of America v. Lois Virginia Caldera
9th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blackford v. United States, 247 F.2d 745, 752 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 914 , 78 S.Ct. 672 , 2 L.Ed.2d 586 (1958).
cited Cited "see" James Daniel Morgan v. United States
9th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blackford v. U. S., 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957) C.D., 356 U.S. 914 , 78 S.Ct. 672 , 2 L.Ed.2d 586 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Stephen Kramer (2×)
2d Cir. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gonzalez v. United States, 1 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 489 , certiorari denied 1958, 356 U.S. 913 , 78 S.Ct. 672 , 2 L.Ed.2d 586 . 1 Polasky, Collateral Estoppel-- Effects of Prior Litigation, 39 Iowa L.Rev. 217, 218 (1954) 2 See Lugar, Criminal Law, Double Jeopardy and Res Judicata, 39 Iowa L.Rev. 317, 332-339 (1954) 3 If the admission of the testimony was error, the error was not cured by the judge's including in his charge a statement that 'If you find that there was a conspiracy on the part of these three persons to get into those post offices, so far as Kramer is concerned you can consider…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eisinger et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 764.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1958.
356 U.S. 913
Petitioners pro se., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and I. Henry Kutz for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.