green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 728, International Brotherhood Ofteamsters v. National Labor Relations Board, Watson-Wilson Transportationsystem, Inc., Intervenors
But cf. N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.), 9 Cir., 309 F.2d 31, 37-38 (1962), cert. denied, 372 u.S. 943, 83 S.Ct. 936 , 9 L.Ed.2d 968 (1963). 28 We agree with the Board that to the extent clause (a) protects refusals to work beyond the scope of the ally doctrine, it authorizes a secondary boycott, and so is pro tanto void under 8(e) of the Labor Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sahara Datsun, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
See also Local No. 2 of the Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons Int’l Assoc. v. Paramount Plastering, Inc., 310 F.2d 179, 187 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 944 , 83 S.Ct. 935 , 9 L.Ed.2d 968 (1963). (“If it existed, even in small part, for the purpose of dealing with employers concerning grievances or disputes, or conditions of work, it was a ‘labor organization’ within the 29 U.S.C. § 152 (5) definition____”) The regional director found that the LWW is a bona fide labor organization.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Henry Forrest
Compare United States v. Nicoletti, 310 F.2d 359 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 942 , 83 S.Ct. 935 , 9 L.Ed.2d 968 (1963) (Two-witness rule held inapplicable in perjury prosecution where question was whether defendant willfully and knowingly spoke falsely when he testified that he could not recall an earlier interview with FBI agents). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keystone Coat & Apron Mfg. Corp.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 788.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1963.
Edwin J. McDermott for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for the United States.
Published
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.