green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Arnold Tours, Inc. v. William B. Camp, the Wingate Corporation v. Industerial National Bank
Co. v. REA, W.D.La., 1964, 236 F.Supp. 271, 277 , rev’d, 5 Cir., 354 F.2d 859 , cert. denied 385 U.S. 815 , 87 S.Ct. 34 , 17 L.Ed.2d 54 ; but cf. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 1955, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 225 F.2d 924 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 884 , 76 S.Ct. 137 , 100 L.Ed. 780 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooke v. Griffiths-Garcia Corp.
See White v. Luber, 144 A.2d 774, 776 (1958) (summary judgment inappropriate “when such factors as motive, intent and conscience were ‘necessary instruments in obtaining truth’ ” (quoting Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955))). *1258 The fact that Griffiths-Garcia maintains that it relied on the representations of the sellers’ attorney about the status of appellant’s contract with the sellers does not necessarily insulate it from liability because its reliance must be reasonable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Haberman v. Tobin
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955), wherein the court stated “Of course, it is irrelevant that plaintiff owns but a few shares (except upon a demand for security under the New York statute . . .” Id. at 761 (footnote omitted). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fincke v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 .” As shown above, there are genuine issues of material fact here which must be reserved for the fact finder and the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim of Phoenix must be denied. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Altus Flying Service, Inc.
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 . 21 For these reasons we are convinced that the summary disposition prevented necessary examination of conflicting testimony and credibility in the crucible of a trial. 15 The case was clearly not one for summary judgment.
cited
Cited "see"
National Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Altus Flying Service, Inc.
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 .
discussed
Cited "see"
General Motors Corporation v. Volpe
See, Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. C.A.B., 392 F.2d 483 , 494, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 159 (1968) citing Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 225 F.2d 924, 933 , 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273 (1955), cert. den., 350 U.S. 884 , 76 S.Ct. 137 , 100 L.Ed. 780 (1955); Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co., Inc. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912 , 914 (2nd Cir. 1960), cert. den., 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook
See, for example, Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Pettit v. American Stock Exchange
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 766 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955) (dissenting opinion of Frank, J.). 22 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wilner v. United States
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 2 Cir., 224 F.2d 753, 758-61 , certiorari denied, 1955, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 ; Colby v. Klune, 2 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 872, 873-74 . 28 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbot v. Frackman
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 753 , certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 ; Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 1946, 154 F.2d 464, 471 ; Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 149 F.2d 130 .
cited
Cited "see"
William Gart v. Albert M. Cole
See Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 225 F.2d 924, 931-932 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 884 , 76 S.Ct. 137 , 100 L.Ed. 780 .
cited
Cited "see"
Gart v. Cole
See Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 225 F.2d 924, 931-932 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 884 , 76 S.Ct. 137 , 100 L.Ed. 780 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Lowe
See United States v. Pagano, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 682, 685 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 884 , 76 S.Ct. 137 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kansas City Power & Light Company v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the Interior
See 76 S.Ct. 137 . [ 96 U.S.App.D.C. 275 ] Mr. Raymond T.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.
Case Company v. Borak, supra (377 U.S. *103 p. 432, 84 S. Ct. p. 1560, 12 L.Ed.2d 423 ); see also, Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2d Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955), and Loss, Private Actions Under the Proxy Rules, 73 Harv.L.R. 1041, 1062 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New York Central Railroad Co.
v.
Ruddy
v.
Ruddy
No. 368.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1955.
Thomas S. Kernan for petitioner. William Paul Allen for Ruddy, respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.