green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1900
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Williams
“While we found no federal authority either for the proposition that possession of a contraband item is a continuing offense, or for the proposition that possession of a contraband item at different times and places can constitute separate offenses, we find the reasoning in In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 281 , 7 S. Ct. 556, 559 , 30 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Agnel Jones
While we found no federal authority either for the proposition that possession of a contraband item is a continuing offense, or for the proposition that possession of a contraband item at different times and places can constitute separate offenses, we find the reasoning in In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 281 , 7 S.Ct. 556, 559 , 30 L.Ed. 658, 661 (1887), to be persuasive in determining whether a continuing offense existed in the present case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Snow v. State
(2×)
See In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 285 , 7 S.Ct. 556, 561 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887); and Commonwealth v. Robinson, 126 Mass. 259, 261-62 (1878). [¶ 16] The State begins its analysis of this issue by noting our holding in Meyers v. State, 2005 WY 163, ¶ 8 , 124 P.3d 710, 714 (Wyo. 2005), that the double jeopardy protections of the U.S. Constitution and the Wyoming Constitution "have the same meaning and are coextensive in application." Next, the State agrees with the appellant that Daniel v. State, 2008 WY 87, ¶ 8 , 189 P.3d 859, 862 (Wyo. 2008), holds that the double jeopardy clause prohibits the pr…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Silva
See United States v. Chagra, 653 F.2d 26, 29 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1252 , 71 L.Ed.2d 445 (1982), citing Ex parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887); see also United States v. Ansaldi, 372 F.3d 118, 125, n. 3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 949 , 125 S.Ct. 364 , 160 L.Ed.2d 266 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Duffy v. State
(2×)
Accord, Ex parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887); People v. Thomas, 163 Ill.App.3d 670 , 114 Ill.Dec. 746 , 516 N.E.2d 901 (Ill.App.1987). .When it is clear that the legislature intended to punish each criminal act separately, because different evidence is essential to establish the separate charges, multiple convictions may be sustained.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ruiz-Pacheco
See, e.g., State v. Benson, 153 Conn. 209, 218 , 214 A.2d 903 (1965) (larceny is continuing crime); State v. Licari, 132 Conn. 220, 226 , 43 A.2d 450 (1945) (operating auto- mobile under influence of liquor is continuing crime); see also, e.g., In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 281 , 7 S. Ct. 556 , 30 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Powell
See also, Ex parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 281-82 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887) (cohabitation is a continuing offense for purpose of single count charging).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hall
Tvedt, 153 Wn.2d at 710 ; see also Ex parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 286 , 7 S. Ct. 556 , 30 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hall
Tvedt, 153 Wash.2d at 710 , 107 P.3d 728 ; see also Ex parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 286 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887). ¶ 9 In Varnell, 162 Wash.2d 165 , 170 P.3d 24 , we considered the unit of prosecution for solicitation for murder.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marcos L. Anderson, A/K/A Marcos Loinas Anderson
(2×)
Compare In Re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 281 , 7 S.Ct. 556, 559 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887) with In re Henry, 123 U.S. 372, 374 , 8 S.Ct. 142, 143 , 31 L.Ed. 174 (1887); see dissent at 1337.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sepulveda
Compare Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 302 , 52 S.Ct. 180, 181 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) (two sales of drugs to same individual were separate as first transaction was completed before second transaction initiated) with Ex Parte Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887) (offense of cohabiting with more than one woman was a continuing course of action because statute prohibited living or dwelling together as husband and wife) and United States v. Appel, 31 M.J. 314, 321 (C.M.A.1990) (each kiss, hug, or act of sexual intercourse between officer and an enlisted person which o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Hirsch Horodner
Accord, Jones, 533 F.2d at 1391 ; see also In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 282 , 7 S.Ct. 556, 559 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887) (defendant who lived with seven wives over three-year period suffered three convictions for each year of cohabitation; Court granted writ of habeas corpus, holding *194 defendant had committed only one continuous offense); United States v. Kimberlin, 781 F.2d 1247, 1254 (7th Cir.1985) (five-day period of possession of a Department of Defense Patch was one offense, thus multiple convictions violated double jeopardy), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 419 , 93 L.Ed.2d 370 (1986)…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allen Ray Johnson
Compare In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887) (course of conduct) with Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 301-03 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) (multiple acts).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Irby v. United States
See also In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ernest King Bramblett v. United States
(2×)
See, also, in re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 ; United States v. Kissel, 218 U.S. 601, 607-608 , 31 S.Ct. 124 , 54 L.Ed. 1168 ; State v. Licari, 132 Conn. 220 , 43 A.2d 450 ; Kirchheimber, 'The Act, the Offense and Double Jeopardy,' 58 Yale L.J. 513 , 540, and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Witte
(2×)
Compare In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 (1887); In re Nielsen, 131 U.S. 176 , 9 S.Ct. 672 , 33 L.Ed. 118 (1889).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warring v. Colpoys
Compare *645 Hunter v. United States, 48 App.D.C. 19 . 17 In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 ; Ex parte Fisk, 113 U.S. 713 , 5 S.Ct. 724 , 28 L.Ed. 1117 ; Elliott v. United States, 23 App.D.C. 456 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Short v. United States
(2×)
See, also, Ex parte Nielsen, 131 U.S. 176 , 9 S.Ct. 672 , 33 L.Ed. 118 , and In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 , 7 S.Ct. 556 , 30 L.Ed. 658 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Westfall v. United States
See, also, In re Snow, 120 U. S. 274 , 7 S. Ct. 556 , 30 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GRANT
v.
PHÆNIX LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; GRANT and Another v. SAME
v.
PHÆNIX LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; GRANT and Another v. SAME
165.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 31, 1887.
Mr. H. W. Blair for the motion.
Waite.
Published
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
We find that the cost-of printing the record in No. 185 has been............$1327.00 and .that- the estimated clerk’s fees in the same case are......'..........*. 900.00
In all.............: . $2227.00
Of this the appellant has paid :
1. To the printer........$552
2. To the clerk........400 952.00
Leaving a balance of ."..... . $1275.00
which the appellant represents himself as unable to pay, and the nrinter will not allow the requisite number of the printed copies to be delivered for use at the hearing until his claim is satisfied. The money in the hands of the receiver has been collected from the rents of the mortgaged property during the pendency of the suit. We, therefore; direct that there be paid by the receiver to the clerk of this court the sum of $1275, to be by him used in payment of the amount now due for printing the record, -and the amount of his own taxable fees in the[*273] case, not already paid by the appellant. A copy of this order may be certified to the. court below so that it may be carried into effect by an appropriate order of that court upon, the receiver.
The, motion papers now. on file do not show that the matters involved in the appeal in No. 1201 are of a character to make it proper to direct that the clerk’s costs and the expense of printing the record in that case he paid by the receiver. Except as to the payment of clerk’s- fees and printer’s charges in No. 165 as above, the motions are overruled.
Motion granted in part and-denied m part as to first suit / and denied as to second.