Hiller v. Ladd, 173 U.S. 703 (1899). · Go Syfert
Search
Hiller v. Ladd, 173 U.S. 703 (1899). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Shonac Corp. v. AMKO International, Inc. (ohsd, 1991-03-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Shonac Corp. v. AMKO International, Inc.
S.D. Ohio · 1991 · signal: but see · confidence high
See e.g., New York & Rosendale Cement Co. v. Coplay Cement Co., 44 F. 277, 279 (C.C.E.D.Pa.1890) (relief denied in action brought by cement manufacturers located in Rosen-dale, New York against Pennsylvania cement manufacturer that had marketed its cement using the name “Rosendale”); see also American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Manufacturing Co., 103 F. 281 (6th Cir.1900) (relief denied in action brought by manufacturer of aluminum-covered washboards against manufacturer of zinc-covered washboards that had marketed them using the name “Aluminum”); but see Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hiller
v.
Ladd
No. 673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1899.
173 U.S. 703
Mr. A. T. Britton, Mr. A. B. Browne and Mr P. G. Galpin for petitioners. Mr. C. E. S. Wood opposing.
Published

Denied February 27, 1899.