green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1910 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1910
1968
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lonabaugh v. United States
C. 337, 387; s. c. 196 U. S. 640 , 25 Sup. Ct. 796, 49 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Caucus Distributors, Inc.
See In re Coburn, 126 F. 218, 219 (D.Mass.1903) (determining how and when to calculate the number of the debtor’s creditors), aff'd, 131 F. 201 (1st Cir.1904), cert. denied, 196 U.S. 640 , 25 S.Ct. 796 , 49 L.Ed. 631 (1905); W.A.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holmes v. United States
See also Lorenz v. United States, 24 App.D.C. 337, 381 (1904) (“wide range of evidence” is admissible to prove conspiracy by circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, 196 U.S. 640 , 25 S.Ct. 796 , 49 L.Ed. 631 (1905); United *1269 States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 298 (8th Cir.) (wide variety of items may be admissible in conspiracy trial; district court has “particularly broad discretion”), modified on reh’g en banc on other grounds sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William E. Brown
v.
The First National Bank of Newton, Kans.
v.
The First National Bank of Newton, Kans.
No. 467.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1905.
Mr. William Eugene Brown for petitioner.
Published
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.