Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Smith, 266 U.S. 291 (1924). · Go Syfert
Search
Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Smith, 266 U.S. 291 (1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clients' Security Fund v. Goldome (nysupct, 1990-08-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1925 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1925 1975 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Clients' Security Fund v. Goldome
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Furthermore, with some limited exceptions, virtually all claims and causes of action are assignable (see, General Obligations Law § 13-101; see generally, 6 NY Jur 2d, Assignments, §§ 4, 12), including claims for conversion (see, Smith v Endicott-Johnson Corp., 199 App Div 194 , affd 234 NY 628 , affd 266 US 291 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York
2d Cir. · 1941 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Woodmen of the World v. O’Neill, 266 U.S. 292 , 45 S.Ct. 49 , 69 L.Ed. 293 ; Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. Munch, supra. The proffered amendment added one plaintiff, York, who had never transferred her bonds; seemingly, therefore, she sustained no damage, but at any event, the possible loss of 50 per cent of her investment of $6,000 would be just under the required amount.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. Munch
2d Cir. · 1940 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co., 147 U.S. 370 , 13 S.Ct. 348 , 37 L.Ed. 206 ; see also Woodmen of the World v. O’Neill, 266 U.S. 292 , 45 S.Ct. 49 , 69 L.Ed. 293 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Endicott Johnson Corporation
v.
Smith
64.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1924.
266 U.S. 291
Mr. Maurice E. Page for plaintiff in error., Mr. Moe Goldstein appeared for defendant in error.
Sanford.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Mr. Justice Sanford

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case, like Endicott Johnson Corporation v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc., No. 41, just decided, ante, 285, involves the constitutional validity of § 139Í of the New York Code of Civil Procedure. 189 N. Y. Supp. 673; 199 App. Div. 194; 234 N. Y. 628. It is in all respects similar to the Encyclopedia Press Case and governed by the decision therein.

The judgment is

Affirmed.