green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United States
See Brand Investment Co. v. United States, 58 F.Supp. 749 , 102 Ct.Cl. 40 (1944), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 850 , 65 S.Ct. 684 , 89 L.Ed. 1410 (1945); Severin v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 74 (1943); George A. Fuller Co. v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 409, 411-412 , 108 Ct.Cl. 70, 94, 96 (1947) ; Volentine and Littleton v. United States, 169 F.Supp. 263 , 144 Ct.Cl. 723 (1959) ; F. H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kuntal, S.A. v. Bank of New York
See, e.g., Dixon, Irmaos & Cia, Ltda. v. Chase National Bank, 144 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 850 , 65 S.Ct. 687 , 89 L.Ed. 1410 (1944) (holding that a beneficiary must strictly comply with the conditions of a letter of credit).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Brand Investment Co.
v.
Brand Investment Co.
No. 803.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 1945.
Solicitor General Fahy for the United States.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.