green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Territory of Alaska v. Journal Printing Company
S.Ct. 69, 92 L.Ed. 336 ; City of Norfolk v. Norfolk Landmark Publishing Co., 95 Va. 564 , 28 S.E. 959 ; Giragi v. Moore, 49 Ariz. 74 , 64 P.2d 819 , 110 A.L.R. 314, 320 ; Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U.S. 103 , 57 S.Ct. 650 , 81 L.Ed. 953 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Giacomucci v. Southeast Delco School District
See School District of Robinson Township v. Houghton, 387 Pa. 236 , 128 A.2d 58 (1956) (dictum) and Connell v. Board of School Directors of Kennett Township, 356 Pa. 585 , 52 A.2d 645 , appeal dismissed, 332 U.S. 748 , 68 S.Ct. 26 , 92 L.Ed. 335 (1947). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ankney v. Franch
See Benoni v. Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, 188 Md. 306, 308-09 , 52 A.2d 613 , appeal dismissed, 332 U.S. 749 , 68 S.Ct. 86 , 92 L.Ed. 336 (1947) (addressing the scope of an appeal under art. 101, § 56).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Hallandale v. Miami Herald Publishing Co.
See Tampa Times v. City of Tampa, 158 Fla. 589 , 29 So.2d 368 (1947) (city ordinance imposing an annual license tax of ten dollars ($10.00) per annum on retail sellers of newspapers and magazines upheld), appeal dismissed, 332 U.S. 749 , 68 S.Ct. 69 , 92 L.Ed. 336 (1947); City of Corona v. Corona Daily Independent, 115 Cal.App.2d 382 , 252 P.2d 56 (Cal. 4th DCA 1953) (business license tax on newspaper upheld), cert, denied, 346 U.S. 833 , 74 S.Ct. 2 , 98 L.Ed. 356 (1953); Gannett Satellite Inf.
cited
Cited "see"
Lee Enterprises, Inc v. Iowa State Tax Commission
See Tampa Times Co. v. City of Tampa, supra, cert. denied 332 U.S. 749 , 68 S.Ct. 69 , 92 L.Ed. 336 (1947).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grenz
v.
State of Washington
v.
State of Washington
No. 76.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1947.
Published
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 12 of the Rules of this Court.