green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
ANDREWS FARMS v. Calcot, Ltd.
See Bogardus v. Santa Ana Walnut Growers Ass’n, 41 Cal.App.2d 939, 948 , 108 P.2d 52 (1940) (the relationship between the grower member and the local association, and between the local association and the central association, was that of principal and agent, or beneficiary and trustee; that a fiduciary relationship existed which required at all times that these associations account to the grower member for all proceeds received from the sale of walnuts); Accord California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp. v. C.I.R., 163 F.2d 531, 535 (9th Cir.1947) (under the California law the relationship cr…
cited
Cited "see"
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Smith
See Feinberg v. Railway Express Agency (1947) 7th Cir., 163 F.2d 998 , cert. denied (1948) 332 U.S. 847 , 68 S.Ct. 351 , 92 L.Ed. 417 ; Boeing Co. v. U.S.A.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Joshua Slocum, Ltd.
See, . e.g., In re Stanley Engineering Corp., 164 F.2d 316, 319 (3d Cir.1947), cert. denied sub nom Root v. Galman, 332 U.S. 847 , 68 S.Ct. 351 , 92 L.Ed. 417 (1948); and In re Peoples Cab Co., 89 F.Supp. 577, 580 (W.D.Pa.1950).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Feinberg
v.
Railway Express Agency, Inc.
v.
Railway Express Agency, Inc.
No. 469.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 5, 1948.
Karl Edwin Seyfarth for petitioner., Harry S. Marx and Charles C. Evans for respondent.
Published
Certiorari denied.