green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Slochowsky
In resolving this conflict the courts have upheld the Government’s power to maintain an indictment under seal beyond the limitations period, based on “the legitimate prosecutorial needs of the *1567 Government to capture those properly indicted for criminal activity.” Id.; see United States v. Michael, 180 F.2d 55 (3d Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 978 , 70 S.Ct. 1023 , 94 L.Ed. 1883 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see"
Riverfront Groves, Inc. v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Mahana v. United States , 88 F. Supp. 285 (Ct. Cl. 1950) , certiorari denied 339 U.S. 978 (1950) ; Fairbanks v. Commissioner , 191 F. 2d 680 (C.A. 9, 1951), affirming 15 T.C. 62 (1950) , certiorari denied 343 U.S. 915 (1952) ; Daisy M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See Mahana v. United States, 88 F.Supp. 285, 290 , 115 Ct.Cl. 716 , cer-tiorari denied 339 U.S. 978 , 70 S.Ct. 1023 , 94 L.Ed. 1383 ; Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1 Cir., 192 F.2d 841, 842 .
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Mahana v. United States, 88 F.Supp. 285 , 115 Ct.Cl. 716 , certiorari denied 339 U.S. 978 , 70 S.Ct. 1023 , 94 L.Ed. 1383 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David B. Mitchell
See, e.g., United States v. Michael, 180 F.2d 55, 56-57 (3d Cir.1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 978 , 70 S.Ct. 1023 , 94 L.Ed. 1383 (1950).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cosolito
United States v. Heckler, 428 F.Supp. 269, 271-72 (S.D.N.Y.1976); see also United States v. Michael, 180 F.2d 55, 57 (3d Cir. 1949), cert, denied, 339 U.S. 978 , 70 S.Ct. 1023 , 94 L.Ed. 1383 (1950).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simonsen
v.
Emmerling, Trustee Emmerling, Trustee v. Schroeder and Emmerling, Trustee v. Schroeder
v.
Emmerling, Trustee Emmerling, Trustee v. Schroeder and Emmerling, Trustee v. Schroeder
No. 740; No. 761; No. 762.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 1950.
Max E. Geline for petitioner in No. 740., Jackson M. Bruce for petitioner in Nos. 761 and 762 and respondent in No. 740., Ralph M. Hoyt for respondents in Nos. 761 and 762., Solicitor General Perlman, Roger S. Foster, David Ferber and W. Victor Rodin filed a memorandum for the Securities & Exchange Commission supporting the petitioner in Nos. 761 and 762 and respondent in No. 740.
Published
Certiorari denied.