S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo v. Latimer, 338 U.S. 867 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo v. Latimer, 338 U.S. 867 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re the Grand Jury Subpœna Duces Tecum Addressed to Electric & Musical Industries, Ltd. (nysd, 1957-06-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re the Grand Jury Subpœna Duces Tecum Addressed to Electric & Musical Industries, Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Latimar v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo, 2 Cir., 175 F.2d 184, 186 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 867 , 70 S.Ct. 141 , 94 L.Ed. 531 ; Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry.
cited Cited "see" Toothill v. Raymond Laboratories, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1951 · signal: see · confidence high
See Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo, 2 Cir., 175 F.2d 184, 185-186 , certiorari denied, 338 U.S. 867 , 70 S.Ct. 141 , 94 L.Ed. 531 ; Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Roland v. Modell's Shoppers World of Bergen Cty.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1966 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo, 175 F. 2 d 184 (2 Cir. ), certiorari denied 338 U.S. 867 , 70 S.Ct. 141 , 94 L.Ed. 531 (1949); Note, 66 Colum.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kamen Soap Products Co. v. STRUTHERS WELLS CORPORATION
S.D.N.Y. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo, 2 Cir., 175 F.2d 184 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 867 , 70 S.Ct. 141 , 94 L.Ed. 531 ; Pickthall v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 73 F.Supp. 694 ; Sullivan v. Kilgore Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo
v.
Latimer
No. 301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1949.
338 U.S. 867
Leonard G. Bisco for petitioner. Thomas F. Daly for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.