green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
The Coca-Cola Company v. Federal Trade Commission
See Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 (1951).
cited
Cited "see"
Akers Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States
See Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 (1951), reversing per curiam, 96 F.Supp. 452 (W.D.Mo. 1950); Chicago & E.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Bus Traffic Association v. United States
(2×)
See Riss & Co. v. United States, D.C.W.D.Mo., 96 F.Supp. 452 , reversed 1951, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 .” .
discussed
Cited "see"
AW SCHAFFER v. United States
See Riss & Co., Inc., v. U. S., 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 ; Wong Yang Sung v. Mc-Grath, 339 U.S. 33 , 70 S.Ct. 445 , 94 L.Ed. 616 ; Acme Fast Freight v. U. S., D.C., 116 F.Supp. 97 .
cited
Cited "see"
Acme Fast Freight, Inc v. United States
See Riss & Co. v. United States, D.C.W.D.Mo., 96 F.Supp. 452 , reversed 1951, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Callanan Road Imp. Co. v. United States
See Warner v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 623 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 , affirming on motion, D.C.W.D.Tenn., 97 F. Supp. 580 , referring to this specification on p. 582, which sustained 265 I.C.C. 543 ; United States v. Detroit & Cleveland Nav.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
See also Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riss & Co., Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 479.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1951.
Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U. S. 33. A. Alvis Layne, Jr. argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were John B. Gage and Wendell Berge. Daniel W. Knowlton argued the cause and filed a brief for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellee.
Cited by 43 opinions | Published
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed.