green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Laubach v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Laubach)
See, *490 e.g., Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 469-70 (3d Cir.1950), ce rt. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951); and Ley v. Boron Oil Co., 454 F.Supp. 448, 449-50 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company v. Sumitomo Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Ltd
(2×)
Accord, Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 470 (3d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951); Cemer v. Marathon Oil Co., 583 F.2d 830, 832 (6th Cir. 1978); Seamon v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa., 576 F.Supp. 1458, 1460 (W.D.Pa.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffrey Otherson v. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464 (3d Cir. 1950), cert, denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951); cf. Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Eng’g and Mach., 575 F.2d 530, 536-37 (5th Cir.1978) (dictum) (consent judgment). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kelly v. Warminster Township Board of Supervisors
See, Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Light Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 467-68 (3d Cir. 1950) cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karl H. Mayer v. Distel Tool and MacHine Company, a Domestic Corporation and United Auto Workers of America, Local 155
See particularly Williamson, Trustee v. Columbia Gas and Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 469-70 (3d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951). 1 Entered by order of the Court. 1 .
cited
Cited "see"
Robert E. Hanson v. Hunt Oil Company, a Foreign Corporation
See Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 469-470 (3d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951); Wilson Cypress Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Saylor v. Lindsley
See Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 468 (3 Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951); Norman Tobacco & Candy Co. v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 295 F.2d 362 (5 Cir. 1961); Wolcott v. Hutchins, 245 F.Supp. 578 (S.D.N.Y.1965), aff’d 365 F.2d 833 (2 Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saylor v. Lindsley
See Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 468 (3 Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951); Norman Tobacco & Candy Co. v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 295 F. 2d 362 (5 Cir. 1961); Wolcott v. Hutchins, 245 F.Supp. 578 (S.D.N.Y.1965), aff'd 365 F.2d 833 (2 Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Voci v. Farkas
This section of the Restatement has been cited with approval by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in at least two recent cases: see Williamson v. Columbia Gas and Electric Corp., 3 Cir., 1950, 186 F.2d 464, 468 , certiorari denied, 1951, 341 U.S. '921, 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glenny Williams v. Ocean Transport Lines, Inc
See also Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464 (3 Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951), which seems to assume the right of the second federal court in an antitrust case to determine its own law as to the preolusionary effect of a prior judgment. 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown
See also Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, 467 (C.A. 3, 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 743 , 95 L.Ed. 1355 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rowland
v.
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
v.
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
No. 380.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1951.
W. Hayes Pettry for petitioner. C. W. Strickling for respondent.
Application, Black, Consideration, Granted, Should, Took.
Published
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is denied for the reason that it does not appear from the record or from
the papers submitted that the judgment is final.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.