green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Karcher v. Kean
See Blanch v. Cordero, 180 F. 2d 856 (1st Cir.1950), cert. den. 340 U.S. 819 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950); Fitzsimmons v. Leon, 141 A. 2d 886 (1st Cir.1944) (Organic Act of Puerto Rico empowers governor to scale down as well as to disapprove items in appropriation bills since governor may object to an item, part, or portion thereof).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Garcia, Jr. (Aka Manuel Ambriz-Magana)
See Smiley v. United States, 181 F.2d 505, 506 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 817 , 71 S.Ct. 48 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950) (defendant’s statement he was born in New York and lived in the United States all his life insufficient for conviction).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
See dissenting opinion in Alberty v. Federal Trade Comm., 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238, 242 , 182 F.2d 36, 40 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anzalone
See and compare also United States v. Weber, 7 Cir., 185 F.2d 479 , and Smiley v. United States, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 505, 506 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 817 , 71 S.Ct. 48 , 63, 95 L.Ed. 601 , rehearing denied 340 U.S. 885 , 71 S.Ct. 192 ; 95 L.Ed. 642 . 7. “§ 5-29.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warner-Lambert Company v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
Compare Alberty v. FTC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 182 F.2d 36 , cert. denied, 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950), discussed in note 52 infra 52 In Alberty v. FTC, supra note 51, this court set aside an order similar to the one upheld in J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Simeon Management Corporation
Compare Alberty v. FTC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 182 F.2d 36, 39 , cert. denied, 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950), with Brite Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See also Mueller v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 443 . 8 II. 12 Has the Commission the power to require affirmative disclosure? 13 Petitioners argue, citing Alberty v. Federal Trade Commission, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 182 F.2d 36, 43 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 , that the Commission cannot order them to disclose what their product and treatment will not do. 9 The Act states that the term "false advertising" includes "not only representations made or suggested * * * but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Denison
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 123.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1950.
Edward S. Reid, Jr. and Emmett E. Eagan for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle and Ellis N. Slack for respondent.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.