green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox v. Thee Evergreen Church
(2×)
See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Allen, 230 S.W.2d 325, 327 (Tex.Civ.App.Waco 1950, writ ref'd), cert, denied, 340 U.S. 934 , 71 S.Ct. 501 , 95 L.Ed. 674 (1951); Atkinson v. Thompson, 311 S.W.2d 250, 254 (Tex.Civ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North Slope Borough v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge
See, e. g., District of Columbia v. Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 248, 252 , 184 F.2d 987, 991 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 933 , 71 S.Ct. 498 , 95 L.Ed. 674 (1951), and cases cited therein; Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. County of Alameda, 12 Cal.3d 772 , 117 Cal.Rptr. 448 , 528 P.2d 56, 61 (Cal.1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp.
v.
District of Columbia
v.
District of Columbia
No. 491.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 1951.
David R. Shelton and Aaron L. Ford for petitioner. Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray and George C. Updegraff for respondent.
Published
[*933] United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.