United States Trust Co. v. Zelle, 342 U.S. 944 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
United States Trust Co. v. Zelle, 342 U.S. 944 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
90 citation events across 35 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hetman v. Fruit Growers Express Co. (ca3, 1965-06-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hetman v. Fruit Growers Express Co.
3rd Cir. · 1965 · confidence medium
Ct. 559, 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952), the plaintiff, an employee of the Gilpin Construction Company, was injured while doing repair work on a railroad bridge and trestle.
discussed Cited "see" Susan Winter Woodling, as of the Estate of Albert D. Woodling, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. The Garrett Corporation, Colt Electronics Company, Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., Lockheed Corporation and Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., the Garrett Corporation, Colt Electronics Company, Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., and Lockheed Corporation, Third Party the Garrett Corporation, Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., Third Party Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellants. v. Texasgulf, Inc. And Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., Third Party Defendants- Cross-Appellees
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217, 219 (2d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952); Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp., 238 A.D. 493, 495 , 264 N.Y.S. 873, 876 (2d Dep't 1933); Wright v. Palmison, 237 A.D. 22, 22 , 260 N.Y.S. 812, 813 (2d Dep't 1932). 44 Since Connecticut is the principal place of business of TG, the court properly honored the parties' contractual choice of Connecticut law with regard to matters of substance, and looked to that law with respect to the issues of the validity and enforceability or voidability of the Release, an…
discussed Cited "see" Woodling v. Garrett Corp.
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217, 219 (2d Cir.1951), ce rt. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952); Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp., 238 A.D. 493, 495 , 264 N.Y.S. 873, 876 (2d Dep’t 1933); Wright v. Palmison, 237 A.D. 22, 22 , 260 N.Y.S. 812, 813 (2d Dep’t 1932).
discussed Cited "see" Complaint of American Export Lines, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
The court of appeals approved the admission, stating that “ ‘the primary thrust of the provision is to exclude CAB reports which express agency views as to the probable cause of the accident.’ ” Id. at 196 , quoting Berguido v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 317 F.2d 628, 632 (3d Cir. 1963); see Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1951).
discussed Cited "see" Wallace F. Thrall v. Cecil M. Wolfe, Regional Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
7th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Richards v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 192 F.2d 602, 607 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 560 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952), reh. denied, 343 U.S. 921 , 72 S.Ct. 676 , 96 L.Ed. 1334 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. George Silva Salas and Pappy Fuentes
2d Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Richards v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 192 F.2d. 602 , 30 A.L.R.2d 880 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 560 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952).
discussed Cited "see" Rogow v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 2 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 217 , certiorari denied 1952, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 ; O’Connor v. United States, 2 Cir., 1958, 251 F.2d 939 ; Citrola v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., supra. 17 In this case the inference of negligence is certainly as compelling as in the cases just cited.
discussed Cited "see" Joyce O'COnnOr as Administratrix of Benedict O'connor, Deceased v. United States
2d Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 2 Cir., 192 F.2d 217 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 ; Bratt v. Western Air Lines, 10 Cir., 169 F.2d 214 ; Smith v. Pennsylvania Central Airlines Corp., D.C.D.C., 76 F.Supp. 940 , where numerous authorities are collected. 2 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Shackelford
S.D.N.Y. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Huff v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 911 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 560 , 96 L.Ed. 703 .
cited Cited "see" Diego Gonzalez v. United States
1st Cir. · 1956 · signal: see · confidence high
See Huff v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 911, 913 , certiorari denied, 1952, 342 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 560 , 96 L.Ed. 703 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux City, Iowa
N.D. Ill. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Those cases solely involved questions regarding the admission or proper scope of testimony of NTSB investigators. 6 See Berguido v. Eastern Air Lines, *1211 Inc., 317 F.2d 628, 632 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 895 , 84 S.Ct. 170 , 11 L.Ed.2d 124 (1963) (admissibility of hearsay testimony of NTSB employee); Kline v. Martin, 345 F.Supp. 31, 32 (E.D.Va.1972) (sole question was whether NTSB employees had to answer certain propounded questions in discovery depositions); see also Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217, 220 (2d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Castellana
M.D. Fla. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Richards v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 192 F.2d 602, 605-608 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 560 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952), reh’g denied, 343 U.S. 921 , 72 S.Ct. 676 , 96 L.Ed. 1334 ; United States v. Swift, 186 F. 1002, 1016-18 (N.D.Ill.1911); Thrall v. Wolfe, 503 F.2d 313, 315 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 972 , 95 S.Ct. 1392 , 43 L.Ed.2d 652 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.
D. Conn. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States Trust Co. v. Zelle, 191 F.2d 822 (8 Cir. 1951) (in railroad reorganization of Wisconsin Central, court applied the Vanston doctrine to deny interest at a rate exceeding that stated in bonds although allowed by state law and the bonds and interest were amply secured), cert. den. 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stanley Gafford v. Trans-Texas Airways
6th Cir. · 1962 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217 , C.A. 2, cert. denied 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States Trust Co. of New York, Trustee
v.
Zelle, Trustee
No. 534.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1952.
342 U.S. 944
George W. Morgan arid M’Cready Sykes for the United States Trust Co.; and Reese D. Alsop for the Gaston Group of Holders of Mortgage Bonds, petitioners., Leland W. Scott for Zelle; Henry S. Mitchell for the Canadian Pacific R. Co.; Thomas P. Helmey for the Empire Trust Co.; James L. Hetland for the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co.; Josiah E. Brill for the Mortgage Bondholders Protective Committee; and Abraham K. Weber for the Wisconsin Central R. Co., respondents.
Published

[*944] C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Leland W. Scott for Zelle; Henry S. Mitchell for the Canadian Pacific R. Co.; Thomas P. Helmey for the Empire Trust Co.; James L. Hetland for the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co.; Josiah E. Brill for the Mortgage Bondholders Protective Committee; and Abraham K. Weber for the Wisconsin Central R. Co., respondents.