green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Massman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
(2×)
See Parish v. United States, 120 Ct.Cl. 100 , 98 F.Supp. 347, 348 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 953 , 72 S.Ct. 625 , 96 L.Ed. 708 (1952) (distinguishing between delay caused by government’s “want of diligence” and delay “resulting from the exercise by the government of some right reserved to itself [in contract]”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Redfield
(2×)
See MacInnis v. United States, 9 Cir., 1951, 191 F.2d 157, 159 , certiorari denied 1952, 342 U.S. 953 , 72 S.Ct. 628 , 96 L.Ed. 708 ; United States v. Vasen, 7 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 3, 6 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U. S. 834 , 76 S.Ct. 70 , 100 L.Ed. 744 ; Smith v. United States, 5 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 724, 727 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Moorhead Construction Co., Inc., a Corporation, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Grand Forks, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See also Great Lakes *1017 Dredge & Dock Co. v. United States, 119 Ct.Cl. 504 , 96 F.Supp. 923 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 953 , 72 S.Ct. 624 , 96 L.Ed. 708 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jacques M. Schiffer
(2×)
See also MacInnis v. United States, 191 F.2d 157 (C.A. 9, 1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 953 , 72 S.Ct. 628 , 96 L.Ed. 708 ; Hallinan v. United States, 182 F.2d 880, 882 (C.A. 9, 1950), cert. denied 341 U.S. 952 , 71 S.Ct. 1010 , 95 L.Ed. 1375 , rehearing denied 342 U.S. 956 , 72 S.Ct. 623 , 96 L.Ed. 710 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MacInnis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 281.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 10, 1952.
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Application, Are, Black, Consideration, Granted, Should, Took.
Cited by 21 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.