green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.8 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…rule 41(a)(1) provides for the voluntary dismissal of an 'action' not a 'claim'; the word 'action' as used in the rules denotes the entire controversy, whereas 'claim' refers to what has traditionally been termed 'cause of action.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Campbell v. Hoffman
(2×)
But see Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Exxon Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
(2×)
But see Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 2 Cir. 1953, 203 F.2d 105, 107-08 , cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pedrina v. Han Kuk Chun
(2×)
rule 41(a)(1) provides for the voluntary dismissal of an 'action' not a 'claim'; the word 'action' as used in the rules denotes the entire controversy, whereas 'claim' refers to what has traditionally been termed 'cause of action.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pedrina v. Chun
(2×)
rule 41(a)(1) provides for the voluntary dismissal of an 'action' not a 'claim'; the word 'action' as used in the rules denotes the entire controversy, whereas 'claim' refers to what has traditionally been termed 'cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joann Aamot v. Robert L. Kassel
(2×)
See, for example, Marex Titanic v. *444 Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, RMS Titanic, 805 F.Supp. 375, 377-79 (E.D.Va.1992) (at time plaintiff filed notice of dismissal, court was “way beyond the early stages of the case”) (following Harvey Aluminum, Inc., v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953), but recognizing that denying notice of dismissal where “the defendant had expended much time and effort in the preparation of his case and the case was in the midst of hearings” had “very limited application” and “ha…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. Rose
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co. (2nd Cir.1953), 203 F.2d 105, 107 , cert. denied 345 U.S. 964 , 78 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 ; Stevenson v. United States (D.Tenn.1961), 197 F.Supp. 355, 357 ; Toulmin v. Industrial Metal Protectives, Inc. (D.Del.1955), 135 F.Supp. 925, 927 .) 1 Clearly, allowing a voluntary dismissal in the present case would frustrate the purpose cited above.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyaniamid Co., 203 F.2d 105 (2nd Cir. 1953), cert. den. 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953); Morgan Co. v. Minn. Min. and Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
Monroe R. Meyerson, Sidney Milgrim and Central Rigging and Contracting Corporation v. William J. Werner, William C. Sherr, Robert Sylvor, Bandler & Kass, S.D. Associates, Eastern Development and Investment Corp., Eastern Development& Investment Corp.-Maine, Larch-Tree Co., Inc., Wjc Realty Co., Inc., Mid-City Management Col, Inc., General Eastern Building Corp., Tex/miss Apartment Associates and Lawton Associates, and Walter Cook, Monroe R. Meyerson, Sidney Milgrim, and Central Rigging and Contracting Corporation v. William J. Werner, William C. Sherr, Robert Sylvor, Bandler & Kass, S.D. Associates, Eastern Development & Investment Corp.-Maine, Larch-Tree Co., Inc., Wjc Realty Co., Inc., Mid-City Management Co., Inc., General Eastern Building Corp., Tex/miss Apartment Associates and Lawton Associates, and Walter Cook and Eastern Development and Investment Corp.
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953); Ward v. Pennsylvania New York Central Transportation Co., 456 F.2d 1046, 1048 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Co., 594 F.2d 653, 656-57 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 835 , 100 S.Ct. 69 , 62 L.Ed.2d 45 (1979). 19 Both orders of the district court are affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Meyerson v. Werner
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953); Ward v. Pennsylvania New York Central Transportation Co., 456 F.2d 1046, 1048 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Co., 594 F.2d 653 , 656-57 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 835 , 100 S.Ct. 69 , 62 L.Ed.2d 45 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Investor Protective League and Martin F. Randolph, Jr., and I. Walton Bader v. Touche Ross & Company
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph R. Armstrong, Sr. v. The Frostie Company, a New Jersey Corporation
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105, 107 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953); cf. Butler v. Denton, 150 F.2d 687, 689 (10th Cir. 1945).
cited
Cited "see"
Kane v. Cameron
See Forgione v. United States, 202 F.2d 249 (3d Cir. 1953), cert. denied 345 U.S. 966 , 73 S.Ct. 950 , 97 L.Ed. 1384 .
discussed
Cited "see"
D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Franklin
(2×)
See Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 105 , certiorari denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 ; Ockert v. Union Barge Line Corp., 3 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 303 ; 5 Moore, Federal Practice 1007 (2d Ed. 1951). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin Martin v. Lincoln Park West Corporation
See Forgione v. United States, D.C., 100 F.Supp. 239 , affirmed 3 Cir., 202 F.2d 249 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 966 , 73 S.Ct. 950 , 97 L.Ed 1384; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Freeman, 4 Cir., 199 F.2d 720 ; Carr v. National Discount Corp., 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 899 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 817 , 70 S.Ct. 59 , 94 L.Ed. 495 ; Director General of Railroads v. Kastenbaum, 263 U.S. 25 ; 27, 44 S.Ct. 52 , 68 L.Ed. 146 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gianis & Co. v. Ostrau
(2×)
Compare Littman v. Bache & Co., 252 F.2d 479 (2d Cir. 1958) and United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt and Neckwear Contractors’ Assn., 35 F.R.D. 130 (S.D.N.Y.1964) with Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 964 , 73 S.Ct. 949 , 97 L.Ed. 1383 (1953), where extensive hearings were conducted upon an application for preliminary injunction, resulting in a trial of the merits.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Rolland
v.
Rolland
No. 690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 25, 1953.
Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.