green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
T. J. Fountain, Jr., Individually and Doing Business as Fountain Oil Company v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
(2×)
See Screven County v. Brier Creek Hunting & Fishing Club, 202 F.2d 369, 371 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 994 , 73 S.Ct. 1136 , 97 L.Ed. 1402 (1953); Cogswell v. Board of Levee Comm'rs, 142 F.2d 750, 751-52 (5th Cir. 1944).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Gil-bern Industries, Inc.
See In re Strand Theatre, Inc., S.D.N.Y., 1952, 109 F.Supp. 350, 353 , aff’d mem. on opinion below, 2 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 889 , cert. denied sub nom., Ratett v. Kaplan, 345 U.S. 995 , 73 S.Ct. 1137 , 97 L.Ed. 1402 .) If there was no such practice, we hold that the prima facie meaning of the notice was counter to a free reopening of the bidding.
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Hector Bohnert v. Brig. Gen. James Faulkner and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the Army
See Neal v. United States, 203 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 996 , 73 S.Ct. 1138 , 97 L.Ed. 1402 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE EX REL. STATE FARM MUT. v. Bedell
See, e.g., Dickinson v. United States, 203 F.2d 336, 341 (defining "summary" as "an abstract, abridgment or compendium" (internal quotations omitted)), cert. granted, 345 U.S. 991 , 73 S.Ct. 1136 , 97 L.Ed. 1399 , rev'd on other grounds, 346 U.S. 389 , 74 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed. 132 (1953); Tyner v. Sheriff, 164 Ga.App. 360, 361 , 297 S.E.2d 114, 115 (1982) ("Summaries are merely compilations of extracted portions of . . . records."); Lloyd v. Yellow Cab Co., 220 Md. 488, 494 , 154 A.2d 906, 909 (1959) ("A summary is a brief statement or restatement of main points[.]" (footnote omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bedell
See, e.g., Dickinson v. United States, 203 F.2d 336, 341 (defining “summary” as “an abstract, abridgment or compendium” (internal quotations omitted)), cert. granted, 345 U.S. 991 , 73 S.Ct. 1136 , 97 L.Ed. 1399 , rev’d on other grounds, 346 U.S. 389 , 74 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed. 132 (1953); Tyner v. Sheriff, 164 Ga.App. 360, 361 , 297 S.E.2d 114, 115 (1982) (“Summaries are merely compilations of extracted portions of ... records.”); Lloyd v. Yellow Cab Co., 220 Md. 488, 494 , 154 A.2d 906, 909 (1959) (“A summary is a brief statement or restatement of main points[.]” (footnote om…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brier Creek Hunting & Fishing Club, Inc.
v.
Screven County
v.
Screven County
No. 775.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1953.
Benjamin E. Pierce and W. Inman Curry for petitioner.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.