green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Hoyle v. City of Grants Pass
See General Electric Co. v. Porter , 208 F.2d 805 , 811-12 (9th Cir. 1953), cert. den. , 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954) (describing the "two-platoon system," where "firemen are on duty for a 24 hour shift, off 24 hours, with each sixth shift off," and explaining that, under such a schedule, "[i]n 1/4 of the weeks [the firefighters] were required to be at the fire station 48 hours, in 1/2 of the weeks 72 hours, and in 1/4 of the weeks 96 hours").
discussed
Cited "see"
Arnold J. Owens v. Local No. 169, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, Third-Party-Defendant v. Itt Rayonier, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant
It imposes upon the courts the task of finding what the arrangement was. 36 Skidmore, 323 U.S. at 137 , 65 S.Ct. at 163 (remanding the case for further evaluations and fact-finding) (emphasis added). 37 In Rousseau, the Fifth Circuit found that although the employee barge workers did not like the conditions imposed by the company, there was an agreement nonetheless because the employees had been informed of the policy and continued to work under those terms. 805 F.2d at 1248 ("continuance of employment can be evidence of an implied agreement to the terms of that employment"); accord General El…
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens v. Local No. 169, Ass'n of Western Pulp & Paper Workers
In Rousseau, the Fifth Circuit found that although the employee barge workers did not like the conditions imposed by the company, there was an agreement nonetheless because the employees had been informed of the policy and continued to work under those terms. 805 F.2d at 1248 (“continuance of employment can be evidence of an implied agreement to the terms of that employment”); accord General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805, 813 (9th Cir. 1953) (Ninth Circuit held unilateral action of an employer was impliedly accepted when employees reported to work and worked pursuant to employer’s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lisa A. Hultgren Victoria M. Smith and Daniel R. Turner v. County of Lancaster, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska
See General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805, 816 (9th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954); Dalheim, 712 F.Supp. at 540-41 ; Wyatt v. Holtville Alfalfa Mills, 106 F.Supp. 624, 633 (S.D.Cal.1952), remanded on other grounds, 230 F.2d 398 (9th Cir.1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. El Paso Natural Gas Company
See General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805, 816 (9th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954) (important distinction between employees “required to leave their homes” for on-call duty and employees “who make their homes on their employer’s premises”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bogenrife
(2×)
See, e. g., Sorensen v. City of New York, 202 F.2d 857, 859 (2d Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 674 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954); Amelotte v. City of Worcester, 343 Mass. 155 , 177 N.E.2d 775, 778 (1961). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilburn Boat Co.
v.
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
v.
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
No. 47.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1954.
Hobert Price and Alexander Gullett for petitioners., Edward B. Hayes for respondent.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.