green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In re United Corp.
See General Protective Committee for Holders of Option Warrants of United Corp. v. S.E.C., 1954, 346 U.S. 521, 529 , 74 S.Ct. 261 , 98 L.Ed. 339 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of the United Corporation. Appeal of Herbert M. Diamond, in No. 11627. Appeal of General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corporation and Alfred A. Biddle, in No. 11645
See General Protective Committee for Holders of Option Warrants of United Corp. v. S.E.C., 1954, 346 U.S. 521, 529 , 74 S.Ct. 261 , 98 L.Ed. 339 . 11 United's method of complying with Section 11(b) was by way of proposing a voluntary reorganization.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United States
(2×)
Compare General Protective Committee for Holders of Option Warrants of United Corp. v. SEC, 346 U.S. 521 , 74 S.Ct. 261 , 98 L.Ed. 339 (1954) ; Phillips v. SEC, 388 F.2d 964, 969 (2 Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corporation
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1953.
M. Quinn Shaughnessy, Thomas Reath and Henry S. Drinker for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Roger S. Foster and Aaron Levy for the Securities and Exchange Commission; and Richard Joyce Smith for the United Corporation, respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted limited to the question as to the jurisdiction of a court of appeals or a district court to review orders of the Securities and Exchange Commission.