green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara
See Davis v. Musler, 713 F.2d 907, 913 (2d Cir.1983); Traguth, 710 F.2d at 94 ; accord Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 214 F.2d 207, 210 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Enron Oil Corp. v. Fuchs
See Davis v. Musler, 713 F.2d 907, 913 (2d Cir.1983); Traguth, 710 F.2d at 94 ; accord Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 214 F.2d 207, 210 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954). 28 The circumscribed scope of the district court's discretion in the context of a default is a reflection of our oft-stated preference for resolving disputes on the merits.
cited
Cited "see"
Tyger Construction Co. v. United States
See United States v. Borin, 209 F.2d 145, 148 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Graham v. Schreifer
See Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., (D.C.Cir.) 214 F.2d 207 cert. denied (1954) 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 ; Stewart v. Hicks, (1979) Ind.App., 395 N.E.2d 308 .
cited
Cited "see"
First American Bank, N. A. v. United Equity Corp.
Accord Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 214 F.2d 207 (D.C.Cir.1954), cer t. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Moler
See Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Hill, supra. See also Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 214 F.2d 207 , cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth
See Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 214 F.2d 207, 210 (1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954); Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co., 189 F.2d 242, 246 (3d Cir. 1951); 7 Moore, ¶ 60.19, at 237-39.
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis A. Henry and Anne Durrah, Individually and as Partners, Trading as Arawak Chemical Company v. United States
See United States v. Borin, 5 Cir.1954, 209 F.2d 145 , cert. denied 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 .
cited
Cited "see"
General Electric Company, Battery Products, Capacitor Department v. National Labor Relations Board
See expressly NLRB v. Geigy Co., 9 Cir. 1954, 211 F.2d 553, 558-559 (and cases cited therein), cert, den., 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , *730 99 L.Ed. 647 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Batson
Compare United States v. Dawes, 151 F.2d 639, 643 (7th Cir.1945), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 788 , 66 S.Ct. 808 , 90 L.Ed. 1015 (1946) (fraud tolling does not apply to False Claims Act limitations, 31 U.S.C. § 235 ), and United States v. Borin, 209 F.2d 145 , 147 — 48 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 (1954) (same), with General Electric Company v. City of San Antonio, 334 F.2d 480, 483-85 (5th Cir.1964) (fraud tolling does apply to Clayton Act limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 15b; Borin limited).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United Corporation
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 99.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
Richard Joyce Smith, William S. Potter and William R. Sherwood for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff and William H. Timbers for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.