Hudspeth Cnty. Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1 v. Robbins, 348 U.S. 833 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Hudspeth Cnty. Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1 v. Robbins, 348 U.S. 833 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc. (fladistctapp, 1984-07-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peninsular Fire Insurance Co. v. Wells, 438 So.2d 46, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 443 So.2d 980 (1983); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flitman, 234 So.2d 390, 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); see generally Hillcrea Export & Import Co. v. Universal Insurance Co., 110 F.Supp. 204 , (S.D.N.Y.1953), aff'd, 212 F.2d 206 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 834 , 75 S.Ct. 57 , 99 L.Ed. 657 (1954) (question of whether or not loss is within terms of marine cargo insurance policy is one of fact).
cited Cited "see" Rural/Metro Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
Ariz. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carroll Vocational Institute v. United States, 211 F.2d 539, 540 (5th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 833 , 75 S.Ct. 56 , 99 L.Ed. 657 (1954).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hudspeth County Conservation and Reclamation District No. 1
v.
Robbins
No. 238.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
348 U.S. 833
Thurman Arnold for petitioners., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Roger P. Marquis and Fred W. Smith for Robbins et al.; and Eugene T. Edwards for Lovelady et al., and Frederic K. Gray for Thompson et al., respondents.
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.