green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
However, when Rule 611 charts are used, it is required the charts be accompanied by an instruction from the court which “informs the jury of the summary’s purpose and that it does not constitute evidence.” Paulino, 935 F.2d at 753 ; see Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 128 , 75 S.Ct. 127, 131-32 , 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954), reh’g denied, 348 U.S. 932 , 75 S.Ct. 334 , 99 L.Ed. 731 (1955); Scales, 594 F.2d at 561-62 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milton H. L. Schwartz
(2×)
See Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 , 75 S.Ct. 127 , 99 L.Ed. 731 (1954); United States v. Moran, 236 F.2d 361 (C.A.2, 1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Logan v. Davis
See Freeman v. Hewit, 329 U. S. 249 [ 67 S. Ct. 274 ], 91 L. ed. 265 and Indiana [Department of State Revenue Gross Income Tax Division, Inc.] v. Nebeker (Feb. 7, 1955) 348 U. S. 933 [ 75 S. Ct. 354 ], 99 L. ed. 731.’ “I have not filed a supplemental return for 1954, as you requested because the three-year period provided by 30 Del.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sidney A. Erickson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e.g., Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 , 75 S.Ct. 127 , 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954), reh’g denied, 348 U.S. 932 , 75 S.Ct. 334 , 99 L.Ed. 731 (1955); and Taglianetti v. United States, 398 F.2d 558 (1st Cir.1968), aff'd per curiam, 394 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 1099 , 22 L.Ed.2d 302 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Excel Drug Co. v. Missouri Department of Revenue
See also Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 139 , 75 S.Ct. 127, 137 , 99 L.Ed. 150 , reh. den. 348 U.S. 932 , 75 S.Ct. 334 , 99 L.Ed. 731 (1955); Gatling v. Commissioner, 286 F.2d 139, 145 (4th Cir. 1961) (and cases cited therein); and Adler v. Commissioner, 422 F.2d 63 (6th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert L. Pinkney
(2×)
See also Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 140 , 75 S.Ct. 127 , 99 L.Ed. 150 , reh. denied, 348 U.S. 932 , 75 S.Ct. 334 , 99 L.Ed. 731 (1955). 7 In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 363 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), citing Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 , 15 S.Ct. 394 , 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895) 8 In re Winship, supra, n. 7, 397 U.S. at 364 , 90 S.Ct. 1068 9 In Holland v. United States, supra, n. 6, 348 U.S. at 140 , 75 S.Ct. at 138 (1954), the Court admonished that " '(a)ttempts to explain the term "reasonable doubt" do not usually result in making it any clearer to the minds o…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard Luxenberg, United States of America v. George Zimmerman
See also, Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 , 75 S.Ct. 127 , 99 L.Ed. 150 , rehearing den., 348 U.S. 932 , 75 S.Ct. 334 , 99 L.Ed. 731 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California ex rel. Brown, Attorney General
v.
St. Louis Union Trust Co.
v.
St. Louis Union Trust Co.
No. 32.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 7, 1955.
Walter H. Miller argued the cause for petitioners., With him on the brief were Edmund O. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Miller, Deputy Attorney General., Milton Yawitz argued the cause for respondent., With him on the brief was Chas. D. Long.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
[*932] Certiorari, 348 U. S. 808, to the St. Louis Court of Appeals of Missouri. Argued January 31, 1955. Decided February 7, 1955.
Per Curiam:The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Milton Yawitz argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Chas. D. Long.