green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blocker
See McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919, 924 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leovigildo Bazan
See McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919, 925-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Selim J. Blazewicz
See McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir. 1956), cert. den., 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nitin Shah
See also McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.) (upholding the conviction of an accomplice who caused to be made such statements of purpose where applicant had no real intent to occupy the premises), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956); Russell v. United States, 222 F.2d 197 (5th Cir.1955) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
See, e.g., Carrillo, supra. Similarly, we have held that in federal court, "the failure of a party to produce as a witness one peculiarly within the power of such party creates an inference that such testimony would be unfavorable, and may be the subject of comment to the jury by the other party." United States v. Lehmann, 613 F.2d 130, 136 (5th Cir.1980) (quoting McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Oregon Power Co.
v.
Superior Court of California for Siskiyou County
v.
Superior Court of California for Siskiyou County
No. 67.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
Gregory A. Harrison, Moses Lasky and Malcolm T. Dung an for petitioner. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Ralph W. Scott, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
Published
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.'