green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Backo v. Local 281, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
See Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134, 137 (1st Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1004 , 77 S.Ct. 563 , 1 L.Ed.2d 549 (1957); Radio Corp. of America v. Cable Radio Tube Corp., 66 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir. 1933), cert. denied, 290 U.S. 703 , 54 S.Ct. 373 , 78 L.Ed. 604 (1934). 16 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dystar Corp. v. Canto
R.Civ.P. 65(d); see also Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134, 137-138 (1st Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1004 , 77 S.Ct. 563 , 1 L.Ed.2d 549 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured Claims v. Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (In Re Papercraft Corp.)
See, e.g., In re Bridgford Co., 237 F.2d 182, 185 (9th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1005 , 77 S.Ct. 566 , 1 L.Ed.2d 550 (1957); Monroe v. Scofield, 135 F.2d 725, 728 (10th Cir.1943); In re UVAS Farming Corp., 91 B.R. 575, 577 (Bankr.D.N.M.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., and Jerry A. Alexander
Compare Tripoli Co. v. Wella Corp., 425 F.2d 932, 936-38 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831 , 91 S.Ct. 62 , 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970) (in a non-patent action, restriction on resale of certain potentially dangerous products does not violate antitrust laws where motivation was prevention of injury to public and protection against liability risk) with Marks, Inc. v. Polaroid Corp., 237 F.2d 428, 436 , 111 USPQ 60, 66 (1st Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1005 , 77 S.Ct. 564 , 1 L.Ed.2d 550 (1957) (single use only restriction based *709 on safety concerns not patent misuse, and enforceabl…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
BGW Associates, Inc. v. Valley Broadcasting Co.
See also Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134, 137 (1st Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1004 , 77 S.Ct. 563 , 1 L.Ed.2d 549 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. An Undetermined Quantity of an Article of Drug Labeled as Benylin Cough Syrup
See also Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1956), certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 1004 , 77 S.Ct. 563 , 1 L.Ed.2d 549 . 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Omega Importing Corp. v. Petri-Kine Camera Company, Inc.
Compare Marks v. Polaroid Corp., 129 F.Supp. 243, 272-273 (D.Mass.1955), aff’d, 237 F.2d 428 (1 Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1005 , 77 S.Ct. 564 , 1 L.Ed.2d 550 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Starbuck v. City Bank and Trust Co.
See also, Baekgaard v. Carreiro (CA 9, 1956), 237 F2d 459, cert. den. 352 US 1004 ( 77 S Ct 564 , 1 L Ed 2d 549 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Pharmacal Corporation v. United States
See also Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134 (C.A. 1, 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1004 , 77 S. Ct. 563 , 1 L.Ed.2d 549 (1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daulton, Administratrix
v.
Southern Pacific Co.
v.
Southern Pacific Co.
No. 691.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1957.
Clifton Hildebrand for petitioner. Clarence J. Young for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.